Analysis of the Readiness of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to Defend the State: Capabilities in the System of Military and National Security
Abstract
Purpose. Analysis and clarification of the term “readiness of the Armed Forces” for the defense of the state.
Method. To base on a systemic approach, which involves a holistic study of the content, structure and interrelationships of the elements of the training process in the interests of assessing and monitoring the level of readiness of the Armed Forces for the defense of the state. The study used a set of general scientific methods of cognition, in particular empirical methods (observation, comparative analysis) and theoretical (analysis, synthesis, generalization and explanation).
Practical value of the study. Considering the preparation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for the defense of the state as a process that unfolds over time should allow the calculation of “readiness” as an integral indicator that can change depending on the available resources. Under such conditions, the flexibility of managerial influence on the preparation process is manifested in comparing alternative options for measures, identifying excess costs, and shaping the trajectory of achieving a given level of readiness.
Future research. It is advisable to focus on analyzing the impact of external and internal factors on the process of preparing the Armed Forces for the defense of the state, as a result of whose interaction readiness emerges as an integral property of a complex socio-technical system. Decomposing the preparation process into individual subsystems that form the components of capabilities makes it possible to identify their functional interrelationships and to substantiate the composition and tasks of each subsystem in achieving the overall defense effect. Determining the priority of capability-building measures with due regard to assigned tasks and probable defense scenarios provides a methodological basis for developing a system of qualitative and quantitative readiness indicators necessary for planning, assessing, and adjusting the preparation of the Armed Forces for the defense of the state.
Paper type. Theoretical, practical.
Downloads
References
Semenenko, O., Abramova, M., Taran, O., Poberezhets, T., Kravchenko, Y., & Palamarchuk, S. (2023). Analysis of the theory and practice of defining, justifying and evaluating the defense adequacy of the state. Social Development and Security, 13(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2023.13.1.5
Lescoutre, S. R. (n.d.). Defense planning overview. NATO Allied Command Transformation, NATO Security Investment Programme Staff Element Europe.
Dieniezhkin, M., & Plakhuta, O. (2016). Standarty NATO ta oboronne planuvannia v Zbroinykh Sylakh Ukrainy [NATO standards and defense planning in the Armed Forces of Ukraine]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Tsentralnoho naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy, (3[77]).
Dieniezhkin, M. (2021). Shliakhy vyrishennia problemnykh pytan planuvannia rozvytku spromozhnostei viiskovykh formuvan Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy [Ways of addressing problematic issues in capability development planning of the Armed Forces of Ukraine]. Science and Technology of the Air Force of Ukraine, 1(42), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2021.42.03
Solomytskyi, O. (2024). Shliakhy nabuttia Ukrainoiu tekhnolohichnoi perevahy ta novykh spromozhnostei [Ways for Ukraine to acquire technological superiority and new capabilities]. In Problematyka, tendentsii i perspektyvy rozvytku voiennoi nauky ta osvity v umovakh suchasnykh hlobalnykh vyklykiv ta konfliktiv (pp. 350–355). Central Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Radetskyi, V. H. (Ed.). (2009). Osnovy stratehii natsionalnoi bezpeky ta oborony derzhavy [Fundamentals of national security and defense strategy]. National Defence University of Ukraine.
Zamana, V. (2013). Oboronna dostatnist Ukrainy yak faktor strymuvannia voiennoi ahresii proty Ukrainy [Defense sufficiency of Ukraine as a deterrence factor against military aggression]. Chest i zakon, (4[47]), 4–9.
Semenenko , O., Voronchenko , I., Onofriichuk, P., Kharytonov , K., Safronov , I., & Skyba , M. (2021). Analysis and assessment of the military-economic conditions for the development of the armed forces of the countries of the world and Ukraine as a main factor in providing the necessary level of military-economic security (2012-2021). Social Development and Security, 11(6), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2021.11.6.4.
Smolianiuk, V. (2000). Viiskova mohutnist Ukrainy: teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady formuvannia ta rozvytku [Military power of Ukraine: Theoretical and methodological foundations of formation and development]. Perun.
Sokurenko, V. (2017). Osoblyvosti orhanizatsii oborony v Ukraini [Features of defense organization in Ukraine]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, (3), 172–177.
Pasichko, V. (2008). Oboronozdatnist derzhavy: teoretychni osnovy systemnoho doslidzhennia [Defense capability of the state: Theoretical foundations of a systems approach]. Politychnyi menedzhment, (2), 135–143.
Demenko, M., Kuleshov, O., & Petrenko, O. (2018). Propozytsii shchodo vyznachennia poniattia boiovoi hotovnosti viiskovykh chastyn (pidrozdiliv) ZRV ta PPO Sukhoputnykh viisk [Proposals for defining combat readiness of air defense units]. Scientific Works of Kharkiv National Air Force University, 2(56), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.30748/zhups.2018.56.02
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1996). Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine].
Slovnyk osnovnykh viiskovykh terminiv dlia vykorystannia u navchalnomu protsesi ta naukovii diialnosti Natsionalnoi akademii oborony Ukrainy [Glossary of basic military terms]. (2005).
Dieniezhkin, M. (2017). Do pytannia planuvannia rozvytku Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy [On the issue of Armed Forces development planning]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats TsNDI Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy, (2[80]), 199–209.
Ruvin, O., Dieniezhkin, M., Koloniuk, V., & Havryliuk, N. (2023). Problemni pytannia metodychnoho zabezpechennia oboronnoho planuvannia rozvytku Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy na osnovi pryntsypiv i pravyl krain-chleniv NATO [Methodological issues of defense planning based on NATO principles]. Criminalistics and Forensic Examination, 68, 698–715. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2023.68.69
Vorovych, B., Horbenko, S., Kravchenko, Ye., & Pryma, A. (2025). Analiz dosvidu oboronnykh ohliadiv u derzhavakh–chlenakh NATO [Analysis of defense review practices in NATO member states]. Scientific Papers of the Centre for Military and Strategic Studies, 2(85), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.33099/2304-2745/2025-2-85/24-33
Brown, C. Q., Jr., & Berger, D. H. (2021, March 15). Redefine readiness or lose. War on the Rocks.
Krykun, P., Pavlenko, V., Korendovych, V., Yasenko, S., & Tkach, M. (2024). Rozbudova natsionalnoi systemy oboronnoho planuvannia Ukrainy za yevroatlantychnymy pryntsypamy: voienno-istorychnyi analiz. Social Development and Security, 14(3), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2024.14.3.2
Telelym, V., Punda, Yu., & Kosevtsov, V. (2015). Pohliady na orhanizatsiiu protsesu upravlinnia pidhotovkoiu derzhavy do oborony [Views on organizing the process of managing state defense preparation]. Stratehichna panorama, (1), 21–27.
Abstract views: 74 PDF Downloads: 60
Copyright (c) 2025 Vadym Klymenko, Yurii Kliat, Oleh Nechaiev, Oleksandr Voitko, Oleh Temnyi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).












