The Strategic Genius: Securing Victory Outside the Battlefield
Abstract
Purpose. To examine the “winning without fighting” strategy, its contemporary relevance, and its application in the Second Karabakh War.
Method. comparative analysis, and synthesis.
Findings. The concept of achieving victory without fighting is rooted in fundamental principles of strategy, emphasizing the attainment of objectives through intelligence, diplomacy, and other non-kinetic means, rather than direct armed conflict or large-scale warfare. This approach incorporates elements such as securing strategic and tactical superiority, leveraging economic power, forging alliances, exerting psychological influence, dominating the information domain, and demonstrating the futility of the opponent’s resistance. While Sun Tzu’s notion of “winning without fighting” originated in antiquity, it has gained renewed relevance in the complex and interconnected dynamics of the modern world. As highlighted in the article, the effective application of this strategy can minimize human casualties, economic costs, and social disruptions, while simultaneously enhancing a nation’s image as strategically rational. Against this backdrop, the research explores the historical foundations, core principles, and practical applications of the “winning without fighting” strategy. To assess its applicability in today’s rapidly evolving global environment, the article examines the essence of strategy, its contemporary definitions, its evolution, and its interconnection with the military domain. Finally, it analyses Azerbaijan’s successes during the 44-day Second Karabakh War, identifying the pathways and instruments that contributed to the development and execution of a national “winning without fighting” approach.
Theoretical implications. This study expands the understanding of the “winning without fighting” concept by linking its classical foundations to contemporary strategic thought, demonstrating its adaptability to modern warfare, hybrid conflict, and information operations.
Practical implications. The findings offer guidance for policymakers and military strategists on applying non-kinetic means, such as diplomacy, information dominance, and psychological operations—to achieve strategic objectives while minimizing casualties, economic costs, and social disruption..
Value. This article contributes to strategic studies by bridging ancient military theory with modern conflict realities, offering both conceptual clarity and actionable insights for implementing “winning without fighting” in contemporary security contexts.
Paper type. Theoretical.
Downloads
References
Ami-Jacques, R. (2023). Rethinking lines of operations: Jomini’s contribution to the conceptualization of strategy in the early nineteenth century [online]. War in History, 30(1), pp.21–37, January. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/wiha/30/4 [Accessed: 5 August 2025].
Artur, K.T. (2007). Sun Tzu’s war theory in the twenty-first century. U.S. Army War College, Strategy Research Project, 26 March. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA470026.pdf [Accessed: 11 July 2025].
Čajić, J. (2016). The relevance of Clausewitz's theory of war to contemporary conflict resolution [online]. Connections, 15(1), Winter. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26326430?seq=1 [Accessed: 17 May 2025].
Cavanaugh, M.L. (2016). What is strategy? [online]. Modern War Institute, 11 October. Available at: https://mwi.westpoint.edu/what-is-strategy/ [Accessed: 11 August 2025].
CQ Almanac (1975) Vietnam statistics – war costs: complete picture impossible. Available at: https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal75-1213988 [Accessed: 13 August 2025].
Encyclopædia Britannica (2025). Peloponnesian War. Last updated 26 March. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/event/Peloponnesian-War [Accessed: 21 May 2025].
Evans, R. (2014). Machiavelli’s 27 rules of war. War on the Rocks, 3 August. Available at: https://warontherocks.com/2014/08/machiavellis-27-rules-of-war/ [Accessed: 12 August 2025].
Francisco, J.G. (2016). Strategists and strategos. Strategy and Management Business Review, March. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297734687_-Strategists_and_Strategos [Accessed :1 June 2025].
Freedman, L. (2018). The meaning of strategy, part II: the objectives. Texas National Security Review, 1(1), February. Available at: https://tnsr.org/2018/02/meaning-strategy-part-ii-objectives/ [Accessed: 12 May 2025].
Ghantous, N. (2025). What are proxy wars and where are they happening? Fair Planet, Political Violence, 7 January. Available at: https://www.fairplanet.org/story/what-are-proxy-wars-and-where-are-they-happening/ [Accessed: 22 June 2025].
Great Russian Encyclopedia (2022). Military strategy. 3 August. Available at: https://bigenc.ru/c/voennaia-strategiia-42315c/?v=4465945 [Accessed: 8 June 2025].
Guner, E., Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2022). Theories of war in practice: causes and termination (in the example of the Second Karabakh War). Wiedza Obronna. https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-89aad26d-dfd7-43bb-bd20-7a03a28fee22 [Accessed: 5 August 2025].
Hasan, A.H., Iskandarov, K. & Gawliczek, P. (2024). Azerbaijan’s 2023 counterterrorism operation in Karabakh region: causes and consequences. Social Development and Security, 14(3), pp.1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2024.14.3.1 [Accessed: 5 August 2025].
Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2020a). Hybrid warfare as an instrument of political leverage (With a special focus on the South Caucasus). The Russian federation and international security edited by Miroslaw Banasik, Piotr Gawliczek and Agnieszka Rogozinska (Poland: Difin publishing house, 2020), pp. 117-136.
Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2020b). Hybrid warfare as a new type of war. The evolution of its conceptual construct in Miroslaw Banasik, Piotr Gawliciczek and Agnieszka Rogozinska (eds) The Russian federation and international security, Poland: Difin publishing house, 2020, pp. 96-107.
Iskandarov, K. & Gawliczek, P. (2021). The Deterrence as a Component of Response to Hybrid Threats (the South Caucasus as a Focal Point). Civitas et Lex, 29(1), 17-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.6124 [Accessed: 15 August 2025].
Iskandarov, K. & Gawliczek, P. (2020c). The impact of social media on the war. Case study: The Second Karabakh War in Information, Media, Security Environment edited by Miroslav Banasik, Piotr Gawliczek, Agnieszka Rogozinska. Warsaw: Difin. Pp. 162-178.
Iskandarov, K., Gawliczek, P., & Tomasik, J. (2022). Termination of war: factors affecting the outcome (in the example of the Second Karabakh War). Civitas et Lex, 35(3), pp. 7-17. Available at: https://czasopisma.uwm.edu.pl/index.php/cel/article/view/7736/6136 [Accessed: 5 August 2025].
John, F.S. (2020). Sun Tzu’s fighting words. The Strategy Bridge, 15 June. Available at: https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2020/6/5/sun-tzus-fighting-words?format=amp [Accessed: 2 June 2025].
Mahammadi, M. (2017). Afghanistan: From Soviet invasion to American intervention. Baku: Strategic Research Center under the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Available at: https://kitabxana.net/files/books/file/1494860446.pdf [Accessed: 28 June 2025].
Marcus, G. (2021). The eastern approach to strategy [online]. Medium, Chapter 8, 20 October. Available at: https://marcusguest.medium.com/the-eastern-approach-to-strategy-420e1bbf7056 [Accessed: 11 May 2025].
Nasirov, E., Iskandarov, K., & Sadiyev, S. (2017). The South Caucasus: A Playground Between NATO and Russia? Connections, 16(3), pp. 47-56. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26867919 [Accessed: 21 June 2025].
Piriyev, H.K., Tahirov, R.K. & Iskandarov, X.I. (2022). The Second Karabakh War: Military-political analysis. Baku: Military Publishing House. In Azerbaijani: Piriyev, H., Tahirov, R., & İskəndərov, X. (2022). İkinci Qarabağ müharibəsi. Hərbi–siyasi təhlil Bakı: Hərbi Nəşriyyat.
president.az (2020). Ilham Aliyev addressed to the nation. Official website of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, 1 December. Available at: https://president.az/az/articles/view/48205 [Accessed: 9 June 2025]
Sterman, D., 2020. Defining endless wars: the first step towards ending them [online]. International Security, New America, 21 January. Available at: https://d1y8sb8igg2f8e.cloudfront.net/documents/Defining_Endless_Wars.pdf [Accessed: 12 June 2025].
Stoker, D. (2016). What’s in a name? Clausewitz’s search to define “strategy” [online]. Military Strategy Magazine, 5(2), Spring. Available at: https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/whats-in-a-name-clausewitzs-search-to-define-strategy/ [Accessed: 12 May 2025].
Tahirov, R.K., Hasanov, A. & Piriev, H. (2023). The concept and essence of war. National Security and Military Sciences, Volume 9, No. 4, pp.62–73.
Tianliang, X. (2022). The science of military strategy [online]. China Aerospace Studies Institute, National Defense University Press, January. Available at: https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/CASI/documents/Translations/2022-01-26%202020-%20Science%20of%20Military%20Strategy.pdf [Accessed: 18 July 2025].
The Royal College of Defence Studies (2017). Getting strategy right (enough). London: Crown Copyright/MOD. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/508074990/20170904-RCDS-Getting-Strategy-Right-Enough-Final [Accessed: 5 May 2025].
Trenin, D.V. (2024). Strategic deterrence: new contours. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(4), pp.74–86.
United States Joint Chiefs of Staff (2015). The national military strategy of the United States of America. Available at: https://www.jcs.mil/portals/36/documents/publications/2015_national_military_strategy.pdf [Accessed: 6 August 2025].
Abstract views: 343 PDF Downloads: 230
Copyright (c) 2025 Rashad Tahirov, Khayal Iskandarov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
