Formalization of Efficiency Іndicators in Life-Cycle Processes for Military Ground Robotic Complexes

Keywords: life-cycle management, efficiency assessment, multi-criteria analysis, fuzzy logic, analytic hierarchy process, military ground robotic complexes, cyber-physical systems, performance metrics

Abstract

Purpose. To develop a scientifically grounded system of formalized indicators for quantitative assessment of the efficiency of life-cycle processes of military ground robotic complexes.

Method. The study applies a multi-criteria decision-making framework combining analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy logic to capture both quantitative and expert qualitative assessments. The research integrates a stage-by-stage decomposition of the MGRC life cycle with a structured indicators hierarchy covering technical, operational, cybersecurity, and economic dimensions.

Findings. A comprehensive set of efficiency indicators for each life-cycle stage was defined and mathematically formalized. The approach enables consistent evaluation of development, testing, operation, modernization, and disposal processes. A conceptual model and algorithm for data collection and expert weighting were proposed, supporting automated calculation of integral efficiency indices.

Theoretical implications. The work extends the theory of life-cycle management of cyber-physical military systems by introducing a unified multi-criteria assessment methodology applicable to autonomous robotic platforms.

Practical implications. The proposed model can be used in the development of technical requirements, testing programs, life cycle documentation, and regulatory acts governing the adoption and logistical support of military ground robotic systems.

Value. This is the first study to formalize a complete indicators hierarchy specifically tailored to the life-cycle efficiency of military ground robotic complexes, accounting for their cyber-physical nature, frequent software updates, and cybersecurity requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DSTU ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2016. Inzheneriia system i prohramnoho zabezpechennia. Protsesy zhyttievoho tsyklu system. Diisnyi z 01.01.2018. [Engineering of systems and software. System life cycle processes. Effective from 01.01.2018]. DP “UkrNDNTs”, 2016.

DSTU V 15.003:2021. Systema keruvannia zhyttievoho tsyklu ozbroiennia ta viiskovoi tekhniky. Protsesy zhyttievoho tsyklu ozbroiennia ta viiskovoi tekhniky. Diisnyi z 01.09.2022. DP “UkrNDNTs”, 2021.

DSTU V 15.004:2022. Systema rozroblennia i postavlennia na vyrobnytstvo ozbroiennia ta viiskovoi tekhniky. Stadii zhyttievoho tsyklu ozbroiennia ta viiskovoi tekhniky. Diisnyi z 01.10.2023. DP “UkrNDNTs”, 2022.

Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001

Melesse, T. Y., Di Pasquale, V., & Riema, S. (2021). Digital twin models in industrial operations: State-of-the-art and future research directions. IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing, 3, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1049/cim2.12010

Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

Zalypka, V. D. (2022). Osoblyvosti stvorennia ta zastosuvannia nazemnykh robotyzovanykh kompleksiv u providnykh krainakh svitu ta Ukraini [Features of creation and use of ground robotic systems in leading countries and Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 32(4), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.36930/40320410

Mykolaichuk, V. R. (2021). Vykorystannia funktsionalnoho polia dlia otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti robotyzovanoi systemy monitorynhu mistsevosti [Using a functional field to evaluate the efficiency of a robotic terrain monitoring system]. Zviazok, 1, 62–65. https://doi.org/10.31673/2412-9070.2021.0162-68

Strutynskyi, V. B., & Hurzhii, A. M. (2023). Nazemni robotyzovani kompleksy: monohrafiia [Ground robotic systems: A monograph]. Zhytomyr: Ruta. 497 p.

Zhyvotovskyi, R., Gorobets, Yu., & Momit, O. (2018). Indicators and criteria of efficiency evaluation of safety aviation complexes application. Systemy upravlinnia, navihatsii ta zv’iazku, 5(51), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.26906/SUNZ.2018.5.008

Dovhopolyi, A. S., & Zahirskyi, A. V. (2023). Mekhanika ta kerovanist bezpilotnykh nazemnykh robotyzovanykh kompleksiv v umovakh skladnoho reliefu [Mechanics and controllability of unmanned ground robotic systems in complex terrain]. Mekhanika hiroskopichnykh system, 46, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.20535/0203-3771462023302678

Zarubin, I. S., & Sotnyk, S. V. (2024). Efektyvnist vykorystannia robotyzovanykh system u vyrobnytstvi [Effectiveness of robotic systems in production]. In Proceedings of the 1st All-Ukrainian Conference on Computer-Integrated Technologies, Automation and Robotics (CITAR-24) (pp. 150–153). Kharkiv: KhNURE.

Zinko, R. V., Kazan, P. I., Cherevko, Yu. M., & Bilyk, O. S. (2020). Otsinka efektyvnosti dii mobilnykh boiovykh robotiv metodom teorii masovoho obsluhovuvannia [Evaluation of the effectiveness of mobile combat robots using queuing theory]. Viiskovo-tekhnichnyi zbirnyk, 22, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.33577/2312-4458.22.2020.37-43

Myronchuk, Yu. V. (2016). Suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku nazemnykh mobilnykh robototekhnichnykh kompleksiv dlia Sukhoputnykh viisk Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy [Current state and development prospects of mobile terrestrial robotic systems for the Ukrainian Ground Forces]. Viiskovo-tekhnichnyi zbirnyk, 14, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.33577/2312-4458.14.2016.31-35

Diadechko, A., & Zuiko, V. (2025). Forming a Regulatory Model of the Life Cycle for Military Ground Robotic Systems. Social Development and Security, 15(4), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.4.9


Abstract views: 231
PDF Downloads: 122
Published
2025-10-31
How to Cite
Diadechko, A., Zuiko, V., Chernykh, I., & Rakushev, M. (2025). Formalization of Efficiency Іndicators in Life-Cycle Processes for Military Ground Robotic Complexes. Social Development and Security, 15(5), 184-194. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.5.15
Section
Engineering and Technology