Review of partial analitical management models in capability-based systems
Abstract
Purpose: is to demonstrate the coherence of a set of models for management in systems based on capabilities within the framework of known theories (theory of systems, theory of subjective analysis).
Method: the research used elements of graph theory, probability theory, optimality theory, scenario approach, success model and the concept of “active system” from the theory of subjective analysis.
The results of the study: the article formulated a problematic situation regarding the development of the country's defense system; the task of reforming the defense system is formulated as measures to transfer the system from a state with unsatisfactory indicators to a state with satisfactory indicators; a formal notation of capacity estimation through conditional probability decomposition of total capacity is provided; a description of the formal definition of tasks within typical defense planning scenarios is given; the relationship between known models of management in systems based on capabilities within known theories (theory of systems, theory of subjective analysis) is shown.
Theoretical implications: the article showed that management models based on capabilities are a harmonious part of classical systems theory models.
Practical implications: the results of the work allow a significant amount of qualitative research in the direction of defense planning based on capabilities to be presented using formal analysis tools.
Future research: the article considered the presentation of a part of management tasks based on capabilities based on only a small part of the most well-known classical models of systems theory. Further development of this direction of research is related to the formalization of practical examples of planning and assessment of capabilities using the proposed models.
Papertype: descriptive, methodical.
Downloads
References
Surkov O. O. (2018). Pidkhid do vyznachennya sutnosti ponyatʹ “spromozhnistʹ”, “mozhlyvistʹ”, “zdatnistʹ” syl oborony dlya vdoskonalennya osnov stratehichnoho planuvannya [An approach to defining the essence of Defence Forces “target capability”, “actual capability”, and “ability” notions to improve strategic planning basics], Collection of scientific works of the Center for Military and Strategic Studies of the National Defense University of Ukraine, Vol. 1(59). P. 35–40, Available from : https://doi.org/10.33099/2304-2745/2017-1-59/35-40.
Ivashchenko A. M., Pavlikovskyi A. K., Sivoha I. M. (2017). Kontseptsiya oboronnoho planuvannya na osnovi rozvytku spromozhnostey: problemy vprovadzhennya [The concept of defense planning based on the development of capabilities: challenges of implementation], Collection of scientific works of the Center for Military and Strategic Studies of the National Defense University of Ukraine, Vol. 1, P. 53–58.
Zhupinskyi P.O., Vavilova N.V. (2017). Uz·hodzhennya protsesu oboronnoho planuvannya na osnovi spromozhnostey z protsesom serednʹostrokovoho byudzhetnoho planuvannya [Alignment of the capability-based defense planning process with the medium-term budget planning process], Collection of scientific works of the Center for Military and Strategic Studies of the National Defense University of Ukraine, Vol. 2, P. 39–43.
Drozdov S.S., Leontiev O.B., Naumenko M.V. (2021). Metodyka kilʹkisnoho obgruntuvannya dynamiky neobkhidnoho rivnya boyovykh spromozhnostey Povitryanykh Syl na serednʹostrokoviy ta dovhostrokoviy perspektyvi [The method of quantitative substantiation of the dynamics of the required level of combat capabilities of the Air Force in the medium and long term]. Science and technology of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 2021. № 2(43). P. 11-18. https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2021.43.01
Action plan for the implementation of the defense reform. Ministry of Defence Ukraine. Available from : https://www.mil.gov.ua/diyalnist/reformi-ta-planuvannya-u-sferi-oboroni/22082016-04.html
Didichenko V.P., Solomytskyi O.I. (2019). A methodical approach to the quantitative assessment of indicators of the capabilities of air defense compounds (parts). Science and technology of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 2019. № 2(35). P. 27-32.
McChrystal, S., Collins, T., Silverman, D., Fussell, K. The team of teams. New rules of interaction in a complex world., 2nd ed. Dnipro: Monolith, 2019.
Mazarr M. J., Best K. L., Laird B., Larson E. V., Linick M. E., Madden D., The U.S. Department of Defense’s planning process: components and challenges. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND Corporation, 2019.
Tkach І. М. et al., Basics of defense management in the activity of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Кyiv: NUDU, 2021. ISBN 978-617-7187-47-8
Belikova O. Yu., System-forming factors of the functioning of joint-stock enterprises, Black Sea Economic Studies, 2016, Vol. 5, p. 81-87.
Yelchaninov D. B. System analysis in state administration. State construction. 2011. № 1. Available from : http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeBu_2011_1_6
Kasyanov VA Subjective analysis: monograph [Text]. NAU book publishing house, 2007.
Glossary of monitoring and evaluation terms - 2nd edition. Available from : http://www.ukreval.org/ua/publikatsiji/uao-publikatsii/241-glosarij-terminiv-z-monitoringu-ta-otsinyuvannya-2
Guide to monitoring and evaluation of regional development programs / Lendyel M., Vynnytskyi B., Rateichak Yu., Sanzharovskyi I. Ed. I. Sanzharovskyi, Yu. Polyanskyi - Kyiv: K.I.S., 2007. 80 p. Available from : https://www.ipas.org. ua/index.php/library/educational-materials/183-posibnik-z-monitoringu-ta-otsinjuvannja-program-regionalnogo-rozvitku
Zarembovskyi O. Report on the results of the study “The state of monitoring and evaluation in Ukraine and the needs of monitoring and evaluation specialists” (February-March 2018). Ukrainian Assessment Association, 2018. [Online]. Available from : http://ukreval.org/ua/publikatsiji/uao-publikatsii/278-doslidzhennya-stan-monitoringu-ta-otsinyuvannya-v-ukrajini-i-potrebi-spetsialistiv-z-monitoringu-ta-otsinyuvannya-lyutij-berezen-2018
Licina, D. J., Schor, K. (2007). Developing a Monitoring and Evaluating Capability for the U.S. Department of Defense Humanitarian Assistance Program, Military Medicine, вип. 172, вип. 4, p. 339–345.
Defence, N. Evaluation of Defence Capability Development Program, 24, Oct. 2018. Available from : https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/reports-publications/audit-evaluation/evaluation-defence-capability-development-program.html.
DSTU ISO 9000:2015 Quality management systems. Basic provisions and glossary of terms (ISO 9000:2015, IDT). Available from : http://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=64030
Malyshev O. V., Malysheva N. R., Kalmykov V. G., Levchuk O. V. Capability-based defense planning in Ukraine: current state and prospects, Collection of scientific works of the Center for Military and Strategic Research of the National Defense University of Ukraine, 2021, вип. 3(70), P. 54–61.
On the approval of the Procedure for the organization and implementation of defense planning in the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other components of the defense forces, Official web portal of the Parliament of Ukraine. Available from : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/z0196-21.
NATOTermOTAN. Available from : https://nso.nato.int/natoterm/Web.mvc
Chief Information Officer Library DoD Architecture Framework dodaf20_conceptual. Available from : https://dodcio.defense.gov/Library/DoD-Architecture-Framework/dodaf20_conceptual/ .
Kasyanov V. O. Subjective analysis: Monograph. Kyiv: NAU, 2007.
Petrovsky, V. M. and Korotko, G.F., Ed., Human Physiology: Textbook, 2nd ed. processing and additional kind. Moscow: Medicine, 2003.
Slyusar V. I., Kulagin K. K. (2019). Peculiarities of NATO's defense planning process, NTPS, vol. 3(36).
On defense management, integrity of the security sector, 02, November 2021. Available from : https://securitysectorintegrity.com/uk/оборонний-менеджмент/оборонний-менеджмент/
Grebeniuk M.V., Salkuntsan S.M., Ostakh Y.P., Shygida A.I. Basics of planning operations according to NATO standards: training. manual Kyiv: NUOU, 2015.
Standards E., EN 9103, Available from : https://www.en-standard.eu. https://www.en-standard.eu/csn-en-9103-aerospace-series-quality-management-systems-variation-management-of-key-characteristics/
BS-6143-1. Guide to the economics of quality. Process cost model. British Standard Institute, 1992.
Abstract views: 176 PDF Downloads: 334
Copyright (c) 2023 Serhii Yasenko, Ivan Tkach
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
