Strategic Aspects of the Management of Military Pedagogical Personnel within the Context of National Security
Abstract
Purpose. To investigate the strategic foundations of managing the activities of military pedagogical personnel in the context of national security and to determine the application possibilities of modern approaches in this field.
Method: The study employed the methods of systems approach and comparative analysis.
Theoretical implications. The activities of military pedagogical personnel are of strategic importance as an integral component of the national security system. Contemporary approaches confirm that management in this field is based on systemic, competence-based, and adaptive models. At the same time, digitalization and integration into international standards further strengthen the theoretical foundations of the pedagogical process.
Practical implications. Proper management of military pedagogical personnel significantly enhances the quality and effectiveness of the training process. The application of modern management approaches enables the improvement of trainees’ professional preparedness and better adaptation to real combat conditions. At the same time, the use of digital technologies and innovative training methods strengthens the flexibility and results-oriented nature of pedagogical activities.
Value. This article systematizes strategic approaches to the management of military pedagogical personnel within the context of national security, thereby forming a solid scientific basis for both theoretical and practical development in this field.
Paper type. Theoretical.
Downloads
References
Ahmadov, H. (2026). Methodological foundations of military scientific and pedagogical personnel training in the context of national security. Social Development and Security, 16(1), 380–385. https://paperssds.eu/index.php/JSPSDS/article/view/1007/1201
Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page. https://books.google.az/books/about/Armstrong_s_Handbook_of_Human_Resource_M.html?id=BSNEngEACAAJ
Azərbaycan Respublikasının Milli Təhlükəsizlik Konsepsiyası. (2007). https://e-qanun.az/framework/13373
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory. https://monoskop.org/File:Von_Bertalanffy_Ludwig_General_System_Theory_1968.pdf
Durkheim, E. (1956). Education and sociology. https://books.google.az/books/about/Education_and_Sociology.html?id=QnvuzwY_z_YC
European Defence Agency. (2022). Defence data and innovation report. https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/brochures/2022-eda_defencedata_web.pdf
Həsənov, A., & Hüseynov, S. (2018). Lider və komandir anlayışlarının tədqiqi. Hərbi Bilik, (1), 137–144.
Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. https://books.google.az/books/about/Hidden_Order.html?id=jQHvAAAAMAAJ
McKinsey Global Institute. (2022). The state of AI in education. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/how-we-help-clients
Mammadzada, M. (2025). The experience of using innovative technologies in the training process of military pedagogical personnel. Social Development and Security, 15(6), 112–118. https://paperssds.eu/index.php/JSPSDS/article/view/960
NATO Science and Technology Organization. (2023). Science & technology trends 2023–2043 (Vol. 1). https://www.sto.nato.int/document/science-technology-trends-2023-2043-vol-1/
NATO. (2022). Strategic concept. https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/publications-and-reports/strategic-concepts/2022/290622-strategic-concept.pdf
OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2021_589b283f-en.html
U.S. Department of Defense. (2020). Resilience and readiness programs. https://www.defense.gov
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press. https://home.fau.edu/musgrove/web/vygotsky1978.pdf
Abstract views: 173 PDF Downloads: 199
Copyright (c) 2026 Mujkan Mammadzada

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





