Assessment of the Effectiveness of Devices for Monitoring the Stability of Building Structures During Rescue Operations in Debris Zones

Keywords: Monitoring, Building Structure, Building, Safety Assurance

Abstract

Purpose. To identify the most effective equipment for rescuers of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine in order to enhance safety and improve the efficiency of rescue operations in destruction zones.

Method. An analytical review of global experience in the use of sensor technologies during rescue operations, an examination of their technical characteristics, operating principles, and practical applications, as well as a comparative analysis of their effectiveness during rescue work in areas of structural collapse.

Findings. Six innovative devices for structural condition monitoring were selected. It was established that the Leader WASP and Leader SENTRY B1 are the most effective for timely warning of hazardous displacements and for creating safe working zones for rescuers of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine. It was also determined that no single device is universal — their effectiveness depends on the type of damage, access conditions, required response speed, and the scale of destruction.

Theoretical implications. the work systematizes modern technical solutions for monitoring the structural stability of buildings, summarizing international experience with sensor systems and forming a scientific foundation for implementing multi-level structural monitoring during rescue operations.

Practical implications. the obtained results allow for informed selection of devices for real-time monitoring of unstable structures, increase the safety of rescuers, reduce the risk of secondary collapses, and enable the development of combined monitoring systems adapted to wartime conditions (mobility, autonomy, rapid deployment, and suitability for hard-to-reach locations).

Originality. For the first time in the context of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, a comprehensive comparative analysis of devices with different technological principles (inclinometers, accelerometers, crack gauges, laser systems, and multiparametric monitoring devices) has been conducted, allowing for the development of practical recommendations for their implementation in rescue operations.

Research limitations. The limitations concern the absence of full-scale field testing of the devices under real collapse conditions, as well as the dependence of device effectiveness on accessibility and the quality of initial data regarding the structural condition. Future research may focus on integrated sensor systems and their operational testing.

Paper type. Review.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Commission. (n.d.). Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC). https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/what/civil-protection/emergency-response-coordination-centre-ercc_en

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (n.d.). Reports and data. https://www.fema.gov/about/reports-and-data

MDPI. (n.d.). Sensors. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors

Elsevier. (n.d.). Engineering Structures. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/engineering-structures

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (n.d.). MIT. https://www.mit.edu/

LEADER Group. (n.d.). Use LEADER WASP stability controller during search and rescue operations. https://www.leader-group.company/en/news/generales/use-leader-wasp-stability-controller-during-search-and-rescue-operation

LEADER Group. (n.d.). Structural movement telemeter LEADER SENTRY B1. https://www.leader-group.company/en/safety-and-monitoring-equipment/structural-movement-monitor-telemeter-stability-controller/structural-movement-telemeter-leader-sentry-b1

Resensys. (n.d.). SenSpot™ wireless tilt sensor. https://resensys.com/r20/wireless-products-senspot/structural-movement-tilt-deformation-damage-detection.html

Semex EngCon. (n.d.). MENHIR vibration measurement device. https://semex-engcon.com/en/measuring-equipment/menhir


Abstract views: 41
PDF Downloads: 33
Published
2025-12-31
How to Cite
Perehin, A., Huz, A., Shevchenko, R., Melezhyk, R., Lypovyi, V., & Strilets, V. (2025). Assessment of the Effectiveness of Devices for Monitoring the Stability of Building Structures During Rescue Operations in Debris Zones. Social Development and Security, 15(6), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.6.18
Section
Civil Security

Most read articles by the same author(s)