Application of the Program-Target and Process-Oriented Approach to Defense Resource Management in the System of Shaping Ukraine’s Economic Security
Abstract
Purpose. The article conducts a comparative analysis of program-target and process-oriented approaches to defense resource management in Ukraine to reveal their advantages, limitations, and optimal integration for strengthening economic security.
Method. Applied a comprehensive framework combining document and literature review, systems and comparative analysis, content analysis, synthesis, international case studies, and elements of statistical evaluation.
Findings. The program-target approach offers clear goals and efficient resource use but lacks flexibility. The process-oriented approach ensures adaptability and continuous improvement but requires more resources and coordination. For Ukraine, integration is optimal, though under wartime conditions the process-oriented model is more effective due to its flexibility.
Theoretical implications. Enhances understanding of defense planning as a complex process, aligns management theory with wartime economic needs, and provides a basis for interdisciplinary studies in security, management, and defense economics.
Originality / Value. Delivers a structured comparison of two approaches in wartime, identifies conditions of their effectiveness, and provides insights for improving defense programs and management mechanisms.
Limitations / Future research. The study is mainly theoretical with limited empirical data. Further research should develop hybrid models, test process-oriented planning in practice, and adapt NATO standards to Ukraine’s defense resource management.
Paper type. Theoretical.
Downloads
References
Ukrainian Institute of National Memory. (n.d.). Russian-Ukrainian war: Historical context. https://uinp.gov.ua/informaciyni-materialy/rosiysko-ukrayinska-viyna-istorychnyy-kontekst
Snyder, T. (n.d.). Why the Ukrainian victory is important for the world?. Ukrainian Institute of National Memory. https://uinp.gov.ua/informaciyni-materialy/rosiysko-ukrayinska-viyna
National Library of Ukraine. (n.d.). Anatomy of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict (2014–2022) in the era of hybrid wars. http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/node/5937
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2001). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. HarperCollins.
Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press.
Harrington, H. J. (1991). Business process improvement: The breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity and competitiveness. McGraw-Hill.
Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space in the organization chart. Jossey-Bass.
Hammer, M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review.
Krainika, M. I. (1977). Upravlenie oboronoy gosudarstva [State defense management].
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon and Schuster.
Grover, V., & Kettinger, W. J. (1995). Process think: Winning perspectives for business change in the information age. McGraw-Hill.
Schonberger, R. J. (1996). World class manufacturing: The lessons of simplicity applied. Free Press.
McCormack, K. P., & Johnson, W. C. (2001). Business process orientation: Gaining the e-business competitive advantage. CRC Press.
Savruk, O. (n.d.). Strategic thinking / Стратегічне мислення. https://my.kmbs.ua/pluginfile.php
Savruk, O. (n.d.). Strategic idea / Стратегічна ідея. https://my.kmbs.ua/pluginfile.php
Harrington, H. J. (1995). Total improvement management: The next generation in performance improvement. McGraw-Hill.
Abstract views: 360 PDF Downloads: 417
Copyright (c) 2024 Lesia Skurinevska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





