Partial method of assessment of tank brigade preparedness level during combat readiness recovery
Abstract
The radical changes in the nature of modern military conflicts, the range and content of the tasks involved in the Armed Forces of Ukraine require a series of measures aimed at improving their training system. One of the components of the Armed Forces training is combat training, which is conducted both in peacetime and during a special period. The experience of the counter-terrorist operation and the operation of the Joint Forces in eastern Ukraine shows that the successful accomplishment of combat tasks by tank brigades (units) to a large extent depends on the effectiveness of combat training during combat readiness recovery, the result of which is their preparedness level. All this requires finding and implementing new approaches to the organization and conduction of combat training during combat readiness recovery, which requires the development of a scientific and methodological apparatus to assess their preparedness level. Based on scientific and methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of military units combat training and the experience of carrying out combat readiness recovery, the article presents a partial methodology for assessing the tank brigade preparedness level during combat readiness recovery, which takes into account the preparedness level of each structural unit of the brigade, taking into account its importance. Assessing the preparedness level of the tank brigade structural unit is calculated by dependence, which takes into account the overall level of military personnel training and their coherence.The indicators that characterize the training level of the serviceman include: the level of individual abilities of the serviceman, length of service and occupational training courses in the field of activity. The level of coherence in the management of the military unit depends on the experience gained by each serviceman in the occupied position during the exercise (training), taking into account their importance, and the unit – on the results of working out of collective training standards.This partial method allows to make quantitative assessment of the tank brigade preparedness level to perform the tasks on purpose, and also identifies "weaknesses" in carrying out combat recovery, which necessitates the development of recommendations for improving the efficiency of combat recovery. The results of the study can be used in the practice of restoring the combat capability of tank brigades and in the research on the readiness level assessment in scientific institutions.
Downloads
References
Heorhadze O.A. (2015). Kompleksna metodyka otsinyuvannya efektyvnosti boyovoyi pidhotovky artyleriysʹkoyi bryhady. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ Natsionalʹnoho universytetu oborony Ukrayiny “Trudy universytetu”. № 5 (132). S. 47–53.
Zahorka O.M. (2013). Metodychni polozhennya otsinyuvannya rivnya pidhotovlenosti posadovykh osib orhaniv viysʹkovoho upravlinnya. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ Natsionalʹnoho universytetu oborony Ukrayiny “Trudy universytetu”. № 1 (115). S. 26–32.
Kazan P.I. (2013). Deyaki pidkhody do rozrakhunku bahatokryterialʹnoyi otsinky efektyvnosti pidhotovky typovoyi viysʹkovoyi chastyny Zbroynykh Syl Ukrayiny / P.I. Kazan. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ Natsionalʹnoho universytetu oborony Ukrayiny “Trudy universytetu”. № 6 (120). S. 48–54.
Semon B.Y. (2010). Osoblyvosti metodychnoho pidkhodu do otsinyuvannya rivnya pidhotovky shtabiv okremoyi mekhanizovanoyi bryhady, shcho ukomplektovana viysʹkovosluzhbovtsyamy profesiynoyi sluzhby. / B.Y. Semon, H.V. Shpanchuk. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ Natsionalʹnoho universytetu oborony Ukrayiny “Trudy universytetu”. № 5 (98). S. 72-76.
Kostyna O.M. (2005). Shchodo otsinky rivnya hotovnosti shtabu (orhanu upravlinnya) z'yednannya (chastyny) do vykonannya zavdanʹ za pryznachennyam. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi oborony Ukrayiny “Trudy akademiyi”. №60. S. 62-68.
Shevchenko V.L. (2014). Yakisna skhozhistʹ z·hortok v matematychnykh modelyakh protsesiv rozvytku skladnykh system. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ “Telekomunikatsiyni ta informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi”. № 3 . S. 32–38.
Beshelev S.D. Matematiko-statisticheskiye metody ekspertnykh otsenok / S.D. Beshelev, F.G. Gurvich. Moscow: statistika, 1980. 263 s.
Novosad V.P., Seliverstov R.H. (2008). Metodolohiya ekspertnoho otsinyuvannya: konspekt lektsiy. Kyiv : NADU, 2008. 48 s.
Zahorka O.M., Mosov S.P., Stuzhuk P.I. (2005). Elementy doslidzhennya system viysʹkovoho pryznachennya: Kyiv: NAOU, 100 s.
Nurulin R. SH. (2009). Osoblyvosti metodychnoho pidkhodu do otsinyuvannya efektyvnosti orhanizatsiyi operatyvnoyi pidhotovky orhaniv upravlinnya. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ TSNDI ZS Ukrayiny. 2009. № 2 (48). S. 38–48.
Instruktsiya pro poryadok rozroblennya (utochnennya) standartiv ta zavdanʹ z pidhotovky Zbroynykh Syl Ukrayiny: za stanom na 09 sichnya 2019 r. Kyiv : HSH ZS Ukrayiny, 2019. 128 s.
Abstract views: 509 PDF Downloads: 459
Copyright (c) 2019 Oleksandr Heorhadze, Volodymyr Kharabara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).