Analysis of the Channel Selection Problem in Heterogeneous Military Data Transmission Systems
Abstract
Purpose. To structure the problem of communication channel selection in heterogeneous military data transmission systems and to determine the requirements for a switching mechanism under conditions of incomplete and distorted channel-state information.
Methodology. The study employs a systems approach, an analysis of the operating conditions of real-time systems, a systematization of factors contributing to channel degradation, and structural-functional and comparative analysis. The information base comprises doctrinal documents, scientific publications, and publicly available materials on the experience of countering the Russian invasion.
Findings. The channel selection problem is decomposed into four interrelated components: comparison of common and channel-specific indicators, assessment of inactive channels, determination of the switching time, and maintenance of decision stability. The study establishes that channel-state data vary in completeness and reliability, while threshold-based switching creates a risk of delayed handover. The gradual development of certain degradation factors enables proactive decision-making but increases the risk of unnecessary handovers. Eight requirements for the channel selection mechanism are formulated.
Theoretical implications. The study refines the formulation of the channel selection problem by decomposing it into interdependent components and accounting for the limited infrastructure support available to a node under the conditions considered.
Practical implications. The findings may be used to develop communication systems for unmanned platforms, observation posts, and other systems operating under electronic warfare conditions.
Limitations and future research. The findings have not been experimentally validated. Future research will focus on developing an integrated assessment, a channel profile, and a prediction of channel suitability.
Article type. Theoretical article.
Downloads
References
Abels, J. (2024). Private infrastructure in geopolitical conflicts: Elon Musk, Starlink, and the Russia-Ukraine war. European Journal of International Relations, 30(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661241260653
Alshaibani, W. T., Shayea, I., Caglar, R., Din, J., & Daradkeh, Y. I. (2022). Mobility management of unmanned aerial vehicles in ultra-dense heterogeneous networks. Sensors, 22(16), Article 6013. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166013
IEEE. (2017). IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks—Part 21: Media independent services framework (IEEE Std 802.21-2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2017.7919341
Kazimirov, O., Vlasov, K., Kurtov, A., & Potikhenskyi, A. (2024). Analiz zastosuvannia zasobiv radioelektronnoi borotby zbroinymy sylamy Rosiiskoi Federatsii u khodi zbroinoi ahresii proty Ukrainy [Analysis of the use of electronic warfare assets by the armed forces of the Russian Federation during the armed aggression against Ukraine]. Scientific Collection “InterConf+,” 44(197), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.04.2024.063
Kovalenko, I. H., Zarubenko, A. O., Masesov, M. O., & Drahliuk, O. V. (2026). Metodyka otsinky efektyvnosti systemy zviazku za standartamy NATO z vykorystanniam heoprostorovoi informatsii [Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of a communication system according to NATO standards using geospatial information]. Systemy i tekhnolohii zviazku, informatyzatsii ta kiberbezpeky, (9), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.58254/viti.9.2026.10.126
Kunertova, D. (2023). Drones have boots: Learning from Russia's war in Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(4), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2262792
Kuvshynov, O. V., & Pikul, R. V. (2025). Napriamy rozvytku ta udoskonalennia viiskovykh system radiozviazku z povitrianymy retransliatoramy v umovakh aktyvnoi radioelektronnoi protydii [Directions for the development and improvement of military radio communication systems with airborne relays under active electronic countermeasures]. Suchasni informatsiini tekhnolohii u sferi bezpeky ta oborony, (1(52)), 69–76.
Lee, E., Choi, C., & Kim, P. (2017). Intelligent handover scheme for drone using fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Access, 5, 13712–13719. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2724067
Noskov, O. O. (2026). Model otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti system peredachi danykh viiskovoho pryznachennia z urakhuvanniam vymoh konfidentsiinosti, tsilisnosti ta dostupnosti [A model for evaluating the effectiveness of military data transmission systems considering confidentiality, integrity, and availability requirements]. Systemy i tekhnolohii zviazku, informatyzatsii ta kiberbezpeky, (9), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.58254/viti.9.2026.15.187
Obayiuwana, E., & Falowo, O. E. (2017). Network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks using multi-criteria decision-making algorithms: A review. Wireless Networks, 23(8), 2617–2649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1301-4
Rettore, P. H. L., Loevenich, J., & Lopes, R. R. F. (2022). TNT: A tactical network test platform to evaluate military systems over ever-changing scenarios. IEEE Access, 10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3208283
Shayea, I., Dushi, P., Banafaa, M., Rashid, R. A., Ali, S., Sarijari, M. A., Daradkeh, Y. I., & Mohamad, H. (2022). Handover management for drones in future mobile networks—A survey. Sensors, 22(17), Article 6424. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176424
Shkvarskyi, O. V., Rybshchun, O. V., Korolova, O. V., Ostrovskyi, A. O., & Yaroshenko, O. V. (2026). Nazemni robotyzovani kompleksy v suchasnii viini: Tendentsii, mozhlyvosti ta inzhenerni perspektyvy [Ground robotic systems in modern warfare: Trends, capabilities, and engineering prospects]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Derzhavnoho naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu vyprobuvan i sertyfikatsii ozbroiennia ta viiskovoi tekhniky, (1(27)), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.37701/dndivsovt.27.2026.15
Viiskovyi standart 01.112.001-2006. Viiskovyi zviazok. Terminy ta vyznachennia [Military standard 01.112.001-2006. Military communications: Terms and definitions]. (2006).
VKP 6-00(01).01. Doktryna “Zviazok ta informatsiini systemy” [Doctrine “Communications and information systems”]. (2020). Tsentralne upravlinnia zviazku ta informatsiinykh system Heneralnoho shtabu Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy.
DDP 6-26.22. Nastanova “Zi zviazku Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy” [Guidelines on communications of the Armed Forces of Ukraine]. (2025).
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2020, September 17). Pro rozvidku: Zakon Ukrainy No. 912-IX [On intelligence: Law of Ukraine No. 912-IX]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/912-20
Brave1 Market. (n.d.). Kataloh nazemnykh robotyzovanykh kompleksiv [Catalogue of ground robotic systems]. https://market-brave1.delta.mil.gov.ua/nrk/
Gustafsson, E., & Jonsson, A. (2003). Always best connected. IEEE Wireless Communications, 10(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2003.1182111
Zabrodskyi, M., Watling, J., Danylyuk, O. V., & Reynolds, N. (2022). Preliminary lessons in conventional warfighting from Russia's invasion of Ukraine: February–July 2022. Royal United Services Institute. https://static.rusi.org/359-SR-Ukraine-Preliminary-Lessons-Feb-July-2022-web-final.pdf
Abstract views: 16 PDF Downloads: 11
Copyright (c) 2026 Максим Бондаренко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
