Methodology for Substantiating Requirements for Field Storage Sites for Munitions
Abstract
Purpose. To substantiate and develop a conceptual and methodological sequence for determining requirements for field storage sites for munitions as a component of the decision-making process within the logistics support system of troops (forces).
Method. The study employed analysis, synthesis, and systematization of scientific and regulatory sources, comparative and systems analysis, risk assessment methods, and mathematical modelling of the potential consequences of an explosion. The research is based on regulatory documents, scientific publications, methodologies, and open-source data published by research organizations, think tanks, and government institutions.
Findings. A conceptual and methodological sequence for substantiating requirements for munitions storage sites was developed. It includes determining initial parameters, assessing the potential consequences of an explosion, zoning the surrounding area, assessing risks to personnel, and formulating requirements for storage arrangements. The proposed methodology integrates established regulatory, physical, and probabilistic approaches into a unified decision-making procedure. Full numerical testing and empirical validation of the methodology were not conducted within the scope of this study.
Theoretical implications. The scientific contribution lies in the systematization and integration of established regulatory, physical, and probabilistic approaches into a sequence for substantiating requirements for field storage sites for munitions. The proposed approach refines the methodological framework for transitioning from the assessment of potential consequences of an explosive event and associated risks to the formulation of requirements for storage safety and organization.
Practical implications. The proposed methodology can serve as a methodological basis for preliminary risk assessment, verification of whether a planned storage site complies with established requirements, and formulation of requirements for the organization of field storage of munitions, subject to verification of the input data and compliance with applicable regulatory documents.
Future research. Further research should focus on numerical testing and empirical validation of the methodology, its comparison with baseline regulatory approaches, and the development of mathematical models for multicriteria assessment and selection of alternative storage sites.
Paper type. Methodological article.
Downloads
References
Dr J. Watling, O. Danylyuk Winning the Industrial War: Comparing Russia, Europe and Ukraine, 2022–24. RUSI Occasional Paper, April 2025. URL: http://www.rusi.org .
Regulation on field artillery depots of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. – Order 04.10.2019 – К.: GSAF of Ukraine. – 37 p. [in Ukrainian]
Tragedy in Vyshneve: two company executives detained. URL: https://rbc.ua
STANAG 4440 / AASTP-1 Ed.C NATO Guidelines for the Storage of Military Ammunition and Explosives. URL: https://nso.nato.int/nso/nsdd/mail/list-promulg
STANAG 4442 Ed.1/ AASTP-4 Part I Ed. 1 “EXPLOSIVES SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS PART I: GUIDELINES FOR RISK-BASED DECISIONS”, IDT. URL: https://nso.nato.int/nso/nsdd/mail/list-promulg
STANAG 4657 Ed.1/ AASTP-05 Ed.1 NATO guidelines for the storage, maintenance and transport of ammunition on deployed missions or operations, IDT. Київ, 2022, 128 с. URL: https://nso.nato.int/nso/nsdd/mail/list-promulg
Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Unified facilities criteria: UFC 3-340-02 / U.S. Army corps of engineers, 2008. – 1943р. – (USA Standard). URL: https://www.wbdg.org
Gilbert S M, Lees F P and Scilly N F. A Model Hazard Assessment of the Explosion of an Explosives Vehicle in a Built-Up Area. Minutes of the 26th US Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board Seminar. Miami. USA. 1994. URL: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA514151.pdf
Nakonechnyi, O. V. (2020). Metodyka otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti funktsionuvannia systemy lohistychnoho zabezpechennia syl oborony derzhavy [Methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of the logistics support system of the state defense forces]. Nauka i tekhnika Povitrianykh Syl Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy, 1(38), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2020.38.06. [in Ukrainian].
Artem Bilyk, Denys Mykhailovskyi and over (2025). Express assessment of the condition of engineering protection structures of second-level critical national infrastructure objects according to the “fortress country” state concept . Military strategy and technology, 3(3), p. 25 – 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63978/3083-6476.2025.3.3.02 .
M. Petrushenko, O. Budur, P. Bordian, V. Bordian. The concept of safe storage of rockets and ammunition. сol. of scient. work AA Odessa. 2020. №14, p. 165 – 173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37129/2313-7509.2020.14.1.165-173
Doctrine of provision with material and technical resources, works and services: LC AF of Ukraine, 2021. 51 p. URL: https://sprotyvg7.com.ua [in Ukrainian]
Storage, maintenance and transportation of ammunition during combat operation: methodological guidelines, 2022. 128 p. URL: https://sprotyvg7.com.ua [in Ukrainian]
Guidelines arsenal, base, missile and ammunition storage depot of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, 2020. 278 p. [in Ukrainian]
Approved by the order of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine About the statement of the Situation on arsenals, bases and warehouses of storage of missiles and ammunition of Armed forces of Ukraine. (2017, May 30). [in Ukrainian].
Baker W., Cox P., Westine P., Kulesz J., Strehlow R. Explosion Hazards and Evaluation: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company Amsterdam-Oxford-New York. 1983. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com
Methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of a high-explosive fragmentation shell against ground targets., 2019. 52 с. URL: https://sprotyvg7.com.ua [in Ukrainian]
IATG 01.80:2021[E]. International ammunition technical guideline. Formulae for ammunition management: United Nations Headquarters, New York, NY 10017, USA. URL: http://unsaferguard.org.
Gilbert S., Lees F. and Scilly N. A Model Hazard Assessment of the Explosion of an Explosives Vehicle in a Built-Up Area. Minutes of the 26th US Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board Seminar. Miami. USA. 1994. URL: http://apps.dtic.mil.
N. Bowen, E. Fletcher, D. Richmond, Estimate of Man´s tolerance to the direct effects of air blast, DASA 2113, Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, 1968. URL: http://apps.dtic.mil
JSP 482. Ministry of defence explosives regulations (Ed.4): DSEA-DOSR-Policy, Bristol, UK, BS34 8JH. URL: http://assets.publishing/service.gov.uk
Horbenko Andrii. NATO ammunition safety management adoption to strengthen human safety in Ukraine: Public governance, 5(33)-2022. p.16 – 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2022-5(33)-2.
Ivashchuk, O. A. (2021). Obgruntuvannia rekomendatsii shchodo pidvyshchennia zhyvuchosti viisk (syl) ta obiektiv v operatsii za rakhunok vykonannia inzhenernykh zakhodiv [Substantiation of recommendations for increasing the survivability of troops (forces) and facilities in an operation through the implementation of engineering measures] (Doctoral dissertation). Kyiv, Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]
Yurii Sarapin. Increasing the efficiency of protection storage facilities of ammunition (aviation means of attack) from emergency situations by improving storage conditions // Air power of Ukraine. 2023. – № 2 (5). – p. 51-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33099/2786-7714-2023-2-5-51-57 .
V Kozachuk, O Tymkiv and H Khavrych. Views on the creation and use of field depots during operations (combat actions): сol. of scient. work № 1(7) / SSRICNV. – Chernigiv.: 2021. – p. 23 – 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37701/dndivsovt.7.2021.03 .
Sidorenko V., Azarov S. Calculation of results from the action of the explosive shock wave on a man at an explosion on composition of live ammunitions: Weapon systems and military equipment. – 2008. – № 1(13). – p. 70-73. URL: https://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua
Kotsiuruba V.I., Bilyk A.S. and overs. Method of calculations and substantiation of requirements for engineering protection of critical infrastructure objects from uavs with warheads //Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures. 2022. № 109. – p.164-183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2410-2547.2022.109.164-183
V. Kotsiuruba, A. Bilyk, V. Bzot, I. Dzeverin. Protection of Critical infrastructure Objects of Ukraine against Direct Missile Hits Using Underground Structures: Nuclear and radiation safety, 2(98)-2023. p.69 – 80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32918/nrs.2023.2(98).07
Bialyi M. Models and Methods of Information Support for Decision Support Systems for Military Geographic Information Systems. – Qualification scientific work presented as a manuscript. Kyiv, 2026. 161p. URL: https://ir.library.knu.ua/handle/15071834/18785
Hres О. Optimization of logistics processes of securing military units in active combat actions: the ukrainian experience. Scientific journal of MGU – 2024 № 71. p 4-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2307-1745.2024.71.1
Abstract views: 13 PDF Downloads: 6
Copyright (c) 2026 Федір Жубінський

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





