Ecosystem Coordination of Post-War Reconstruction in the Construction Sector: an Integrator Model for the Development Business
Abstract
Purpose. Development of an integrator model for the development business to coordinate post-war recovery of Ukraine's construction sector through an ecosystem approach.
Method. Analytical synthesis of secondary data: cluster analysis of regions by construction sector indicators; systematic synthesis of empirical; content analysis of donor procedures and regulatory framework with triangulation of results.
Practical implications. Five integrator functions, three mediation mechanisms between external and local actors, and an asymmetric dynamic capabilities configuration with seizing dominance have been identified. Recommendations for public policy, international donors, and developers have been formulated.
Value. Ecosystem theory has been extended to the context of systemic destruction. A persistent sensing → seizing inversion has been identified. The model has been parameterized for destroyed and devastated ecosystems.
Paper type. Research.
Downloads
References
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Thakre, S. (2021). Coronavirus pandemic and economic lockdown: Study of strategic initiatives and tactical responses of firms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(6), 1473–1493. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2020-2198
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1kz4h78.
Charles, A., Lauras, M., Van Wassenhove, L. N., & Dupont, L. (2016). Designing an efficient humanitarian supply network. Journal of Operations Management, 47–48(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.05.012
Charles, S.H., Chang-Richards, A.Y., & Yiu, T.W. (2022). A systematic review of factors affecting post-disaster reconstruction projects resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2020-0109
Chi, K., Yan, F., Zhang, C., & Wang, J. (2024). Research on the construction process of supply chain ecosystem led by digital platform enterprises from the perspective of dynamic capability. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(6), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2024-0208
Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Daymond, J., Knight, E., Rumyantseva, M., & Maguire, S. (2022). Managing ecosystem emergence and evolution: Strategies for ecosystem architects. Strategic Management Journal, 44(4), O1–O27. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3449
Denzin, N.K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Donada, C. (2018). Leadership in the electromobility ecosystem: Integrators and coordinators. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 18(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2018.093417
Dou, Y., Zhong, L., & Luo, L. (2025). Supply chain resilience of prefabricated construction: Perspectives of stakeholder capabilities and vulnerabilities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(4), 04025008. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15514
Fait, M., Palladino, R., Ferrara, G., & Ferraris, A. (2024). Enhancing knowledge brokerage drivers for dynamic capabilities: The effects on sustainable supply chain ecosystem. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(6), 1560–1589. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2022-0601
Go, K. C. L. (2025). Innovation intermediaries and key-capability development: evidence from organisations in two Philippine agri-food business industries. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 33(3), 999–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2024.2423224
Gupta, R., Mejia, C., Kajikawa, Y., & Patel, P. C. (2024). Traders as ecosystem orchestrators for sustainable foods supply chain transformation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4455–4475. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3695
Hafeez, S., Shahzad, K., & De Silva, M. (2025). Enhancing digital transformation in SMEs: The dynamic capabilities of innovation intermediaries within ecosystems. Long Range Planning, 58(1), 102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102525
Heimburg, V., Schreieck, M., & Wiesche, M. (2025). Complementor Value Co-Creation in Generative AI Platform Ecosystems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 42(2), 491–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2025.2487310
Hijazi, A. A., Das, P., Moehler, R. C., & Maxwell, D. (2025). Platforms for Construction: Definitions, Classifications, and Their Impact on the Construction Value Chain. Buildings, 15(14), 2482. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142482
Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Kolisnichenko, V. (2026, February 25). Obsyag vykonanykh budivelnykh robit v Ukraini u 2025 rotsi zris na 12% r./r. [The volume of construction work in Ukraine in 2025 increased by 12% y/y]. GMK Center. https://gmk.center/ua/news/obsyag-vikonanih-budivelnih-robit-v-ukraini-u-2025-roci-zris-na-12-r-r/
Krome, M. J., Pidun, U., & Zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2025). Investigating the strategic choices of business ecosystem orchestrators. Review of Managerial Science, 19(2), 413–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00857-2
Li, B., & Teece, D.J. (2025). Dynamic Knowledge Management: A dynamic capabilities approach to knowledge management. Technovation, 147, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103316
Linde, L., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration: A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614
Mohammadnazari, Z., Mousapour Mamoudan, M., Alipour-Vaezi, M., Aghsami, A., Jolai, F., & Yazdani, M. (2022). Prioritizing Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach: A Case Study. Buildings, 12(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020136
Mok, K.Y., Shen, G.Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10126156/
Nipa, T. J., Kermanshachi, S., & Pamidimukkala, A. (2023). Evaluation of resilience dimensions on reconstruction of highway infrastructure projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15(3), 04523017. https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-899
Olanrewaju, O. I., Chileshe, N., Babarinde, S. A., & Sandanayake, M. (2020). Investigating the barriers to building information modeling (BIM) implementation within the Nigerian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(10), 2931–2958. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0042
Open4Business. (2026, February 8). Ukraine's construction market in monetary terms grew by almost a quarter in 2025 — analysis. https://open4business.com.ua/budivelnyj-rynok-ukrayiny-u-groshovomu-vyrazhenni-u-2025-rotsi-zris-majzhe-na-chvert-analiz/
Ozeychuk, A. (2026, February 10). Ukrainian construction market trends in 2025. The Building. https://budport.com.ua/thebuilding/200138-ukrainian-construction-market-trends-in-2025
Rezvani, S. M. H. S., de Almeida, N. M., & Falcão Silva, M. J. (2023). Climate adaptation measures for enhancing urban resilience. Buildings, 13(9), 2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092163
Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2021). Capabilities for value co-creation and value capture in emergent platform ecosystems: A longitudinal case study of SAP's cloud platform. Journal of Information Technology, 36(4), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211023780
Shen, L., Shi, Q., Parida, V., & Jovanovic, M. (2024). Ecosystem orchestration practices for industrial firms: A qualitative meta-analysis, framework development and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 173, 114463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114463
State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2025). Construction. https://stat.gov.ua/en/topics/construction
Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Ukrfinzhytlo (2025). “YeOselya” program: statistics on mortgage lending. https://ukrfinzhytlo.in.ua/analytyka/
Uusitalo, P., Peltokorpi, A., Seppänen, O., & Alhava, O. (2024). Towards systemic transformation in the construction industry: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Construction Innovation, 24(7), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-01-2024-0015
Vigren, O., & Eriksson, K. (2025). A multilayer network model for studying business ecosystems: Insights from enterprise architectures in the real estate sector. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 18(1), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-04-2024-0027
Wei, Z., & Li, M. (2023). Platform Strategy, Niche Strategy, and Firm Growth: A Business Ecosystem Positioning Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, PP(99), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3314271
Winkler, C., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., & Perez Vico, E. (2025). Combining knowledge, innovation and business ecosystems: The case of customer-led orchestration of energy innovations. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-11-2024-0466
World Bank. (2025). Ukraine – Fourth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA4): February 2022 – December 2024. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099021425056517029/P1801741ced2710b20b7b10123a305d1283
World Bank, Government of Ukraine, European Commission, & United Nations. (2026, February 23). Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment Released. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2026/02/23/updated-ukraine-recovery-and-reconstruction-needs-assessment-released
Wuni, I.Y., & Shen, G.Q. (2023). Exploring the critical success determinants for supply chain management in modular integrated construction projects. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(2), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2021-0051
Wuni, I.Y., Abankwa, D.A., Koc, K., Adukpo, S.E., & Antwi-Afari, M.F. (2024). Critical barriers to the adoption of integrated digital delivery in the construction industry. Journal of Building Engineering, 83, 108474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108474
Yang, R.J., Jayasuriya, S., Gunarathna, C., Arashpour, M., Xue, X., & Zhang, G. (2018). The evolution of stakeholder management practices in Australian mega construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(6), 690–706. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2016-0168
Abstract views: 96 PDF Downloads: 64
Copyright (c) 2026 Галина Лопушняк, Володимир Кирилюк
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
