The Role of Citizen Science in Enhancing Resilience and Environmental Security of Ukrainian Cities

Keywords: Citizen Science Project, Environmental Monitoring, Post-War Recovery, Citizen Participation, Sustainable Development

Abstract

Purpose. To substantiate the concept of a citizen science city as an instrument for post-war recovery and sustainable development, as well as to develop a governance approach to integrating citizen science into urban planning processes, environmental monitoring, and civil security in Ukraine.

Method. A theoretical and analytical approach was applied, including a systematic review of academic sources, analysis of international experience in disaster citizen science, comparative analysis of European Union strategic documents and international standards, and conceptual modeling of management mechanisms based on a process-oriented approach.

Findings. The feasibility of integrating citizen science into the urban governance system of Ukraine is substantiated. The potential of disaster citizen science to ensure rapid collection of localized data under conditions of limited institutional capacity is demonstrated. The concept of a citizen science city and a management model for citizen science projects based on the Plan–Do–Check–Act cycle are proposed.

Theoretical implications. The conceptual foundations for integrating citizen science into the system of sustainable urban development and post-war recovery are further developed.

Practical implications. The results of the research can be used by state authorities and local self-government bodies in developing urban recovery and development strategies, environmental monitoring programs, and mechanisms for citizen participation in decision-making.

Originality of the research. An institutionalized model of a citizen science city for wartime conditions and post-war recovery is proposed.

Future research. The study opens avenues for further empirical validation and the development of practical recommendations for state authorities and local self-government bodies.

Paper type. Theoretical.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abara, W., Wilson, S., Vena, J., Sanders, L., & McClure, L. (2014). Engaging a chemical disaster community: Lessons from Graniteville. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(6), 5684–5697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110605684

Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2021). Agenda 2030 strategy for Barcelona city. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/agenda2030/sites/default/files/2021-03/Agenda%202030%20Strategy%20for%20Barcelona%20City.pdf

Barcelona City Council. (2018). Barcelona climate plan 2018-2030. https://www.barcelona.cat/barcelona-pel-clima/sites/default/files/climate_plan_maig.pdf

Chari, R., Stern, S., & Smith, A. (2021). Citizen science for disasters: A guide for community groups. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/tools/TLA100/TLA175-2/RAND_TLA175-2.pdf

Charles Sturt University. (2024). Citizen science – fish tagging and recovery. https://www.csu.edu.au/research/gulbali/research/sustainable-aquatic-systems/projects/citizen-science-fish-tagging-and-recovery

City of Copenhagen. (2025). Co-create Copenhagen: Vision for 2025. https://kk.sites.itera.dk/apps/kk_pub2/pdf/1534_0TdC5G2XZr.pdf

Dickinson, J. L., & Bonney, R. (2012). A role for citizen science in disaster and conflict recovery and resilience. In J. L. Dickinson & R. Bonney (Eds.), Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research (pp. 226–233). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801449116.003.0017

DivSci. (n.d.). Citizen co-creation: Shaping a sustainable future of wastewater treatment in Serbia by pioneering energy-neutral & zero-waste approach. https://citizenscience.eu/project/536

Dovkola Lab, et al. (2024). Ukrainian citizen science initiatives for the environmental justice and recovery actions: Stop poisoning Ukraine. In Stop poisoning Ukraine – Coalition of non-governmental organizations conference. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31795.64803

European Citizen Science Association. (2015). Ten principles of citizen science. https://zenodo.org/record/5127534/files/ECSA_Ten_Principles_of_CS_English.pdf?download=1 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XPR2N

European Commission. (2020). New Leipzig Charter: The transformative power of cities for the common good. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/whats-new/newsroom/12-08-2020-new-leipzig-charter-the-transformative-power-of-cities-for-the-common-good_en

European Innovation Council. (2021). Dortmund is the European Capital of Innovation 2021 with Vantaa recognised Rising Innovator 2021. https://eic.ec.europa.eu/news/dortmund-european-capital-innovation-2021-vantaa-recognised-rising-innovator-2021-11-24_en

Gromada Erasmus+. (2025). About Gromada 2025. Retrieved January 13, 2026, from https://gromada-erasmus.eu/about/

Hicks, A., et al. (2019). Global mapping of citizen science projects for disaster risk reduction. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7, 226. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00226

Liutsko, L., & Cardis, E. (2018). Benefits of participation in citizen science in recovery programs (post-nuclear accidents). Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 75(Suppl. 1), 3–8.

Metropolitan Strategic Plan of Barcelona (PEMB). (2025). Metropolitan commitment 2030: A strategy for the city of 5 million. https://pemb.cat/sites/default/files/2025-04/Quadriptic%20WEB%20ANG.pdf

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. (2018). Community sampling in Tonawanda, New York: Addressing air quality concerns. https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/docs/air_pdf/tcccitizensample2018.pdf

Roger, E., & Kinsela, A. S. (2023). Science communication is integral to attracting widespread participation in bushfire recovery citizen science. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1156078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1156078

Ruckart, P. Z., Ettinger, A. S., Hanna-Attisha, M., Jones, N., Davis, S. I., & Breysse, P. N. (2019). The Flint water crisis: A coordinated public health emergency response and recovery initiative. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 25(Suppl. 1), S84–S90. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000871

Soroka, M., & Dovkola Lab. (2024). Ukrainian citizen air quality monitoring network: Study of war. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31294.29763

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III). (2016). New urban agenda. https://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/

Ukraine Facility. (2024). Ukraine plan. https://www.ukrainefacility.me.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ukraine-plan_presentation-.pdf

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2019). Decree “On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine for the Period up to 2030”. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019#Text

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2021). Environmental security and climate change adaptation strategy until 2030. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1363-2021-%D1%80#n17

UNESCO. (2025). UNESCO Cities Platform: Shaping the future of cities. https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-cities


Abstract views: 64
PDF Downloads: 38
Published
2026-02-28
How to Cite
Skuibida, O. (2026). The Role of Citizen Science in Enhancing Resilience and Environmental Security of Ukrainian Cities. Social Development and Security, 16(1), 240-254. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2026.16.1.18
Section
Civil Security