Factors and Determinants of Resource Sustainability: State Monitoring Environment and Security Indicators
Abstract
Purpose. To study and conceptualize the state monitoring system of national security as a dynamic tool for strategic planning to ensure the resilience of Ukraine's defense industry resource flows under martial law.
Method. A comparative analysis of monitoring models from leading countries (British PSA and American GPRA) was applied, alongside the indicative analysis method for developing quantitative adaptability metrics, and a systemic-structural approach for modeling a five-stage process for assessing resource provision stability.
Findings. The transition from descriptive to functional monitoring based on quantitative indicators (I_a, K_l) was justified; the effectiveness of the "SOTA" system and the Brave1 platform in the context of defense procurement digitalization was analyzed; the expediency of the "Outputs–Outcomes–Impacts" hierarchical structure for evaluating defense programs was proven; a five-stage resilience assessment model including cognitive analysis and scenario modeling was developed.
Theoretical implications. The work expands scientific approaches to the category of "state monitoring environment" within the context of the "comprehensive defense" concept; systematizes monitoring principles (reliability, consistency, timeliness) and adapts the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) methodology to security sector needs.
Practical implications. The proposed integral indicators allow for real-time adjustment of state policy; the implementation of US (GPRA) and UK (PSA) experiences contributes to strengthening personal accountability for defense order execution and optimizing interagency coordination via situation centers.
Originality. For the first time, a comprehensive comparison of strategic monitoring parameters under the GPRA (USA) and current Ukrainian practice was conducted, identifying determinants of resource provision resilience and forming a roadmap for transitioning to adaptive defense industry management.
Research limitations. Limitations relate to high geopolitical volatility, difficulties in overcoming "departmental isolation" of data in certain executive bodies, and the need for constant verification of indicator threshold values during active hostilities.
Downloads
References
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2022, November 11). On the specifics of defense procurement during the period of martial law (Resolution No. 1275). [In Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1275-2022-%D0%BF
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2018, June 21). On the national security of Ukraine (Law No. 2469-VIII). [In Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2469-19
Talbot, C. (2005). The case for performance management in the public sector. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 491–517). Oxford University Press.
Oliinyk, O. V. (2023). Monitoring of resource provision of the defense-industrial complex: From financial control to functional resilience [Monitorynh resursnoho zabezpechennia oboronno-promyslovoho kompleksu: vid finansovoho kontroliu do funktsionalnoi stiikosti]. Ekonomika ta derzhava, (11), 14–22. [In Ukrainian].
President of Ukraine. (2020, September 14). On the National Security Strategy of Ukraine “Human security – country security” (Decree No. 392/2020). [In Ukrainian]. https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/3922020-35037
United States Congress. (2011). GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (Public Law No. 111–352, 124 Stat. 3866). https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ352/PLAW-111publ352.pdf
Danylov, O. M. (2024). SOTA system as a tool for strategic monitoring and decision-making in the field of national security [Systema “SOTA” yak instrument stratehichnoho monitorynhu ta pryiniattia rishen u sferi natsionalnoi bezpeky]. Stratehichna panorama, (1), 5–18. [In Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 51 PDF Downloads: 25
Copyright (c) 2025 Volodymyr Koval
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
