Assessing the Effectiveness of Internal Audit in the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine: An Integrated Approach Based on KPIs and Results-Based Management
Abstract
Purpose. To substantiate and develop a methodological approach to assessing the effectiveness of internal audit in the system of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine based on key performance indicators and the Results-Based Management (RBM) model, enabling its transformation from a control and oversight body into a strategic partner and a catalyst for positive change within the defence sector.
Method. Analysis and synthesis.
Findings. A comprehensive matrix of key performance indicators (KPIs) for the internal audit of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine has been developed, integrating strategic and operational indicators across four dimensions: value for key stakeholders, operational efficiency of internal processes, staff development, and effectiveness of resource management. A logical RBM model has been constructed to reflect the “value creation chain” of internal audit, from inputs and activities to outputs, outcomes, and long-term impact. A key risk—namely, the “performance gap” between the preparation of audit reports and their actual implementation and impact on processes within the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine—has been identified. A roadmap for implementing an integrated performance assessment system is proposed, covering the stages of readiness assessment, development, pilot implementation, and staff training.
Theoretical implications. Two internationally recognized management concepts—KPIs based on the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Results-Based Management (RBM)—have been integrated and adapted to form a unified, logically grounded framework for assessing the effectiveness of internal audit in the public sector, particularly within the defence domain. The study harmonizes two audit paradigms: the national paradigm (State Internal Financial Control), traditionally oriented toward control, and the international paradigm, focused on value creation and strategic partnership, proposing a model in which effective control is viewed as a necessary condition for value creation.
Practical implications. Applied tools have been developed and presented, including a KPI matrix (Table 1), an RBM logical model (Table 2), and a transformation plan (Table 3), aimed at strengthening and enhancing the capacity of internal audit within the defence sector.
Paper type. Theoretical.
Downloads
References
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2010). Budget Code of Ukraine (Law No. 2478-VI, July 9, 2010, as amended; Art. 26 “Control and audit in the budget process”). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17#Text
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2011). Procedure for conducting internal audit and establishing internal audit units (Resolution No. 1001, September 28, 2011). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1001-2011-%D0%BF#Text
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2011). On approval of the Internal Audit Standards (Order No. 1247, October 4, 2011). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1219-11#Text
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. (2020). On the organization of internal audit activities in the system of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine and the Procedure for conducting internal audit (Order No. 475, December 15, 2020). https://mod.gov.ua/diyalnist/normativno-pravova-baza/nakaz-mou-n-475-vid-15-12-2020-pro-organizatsiiu-diialnosti-z-vnutrishnogo-auditu-v-sistemi-ministerstva-oboroni-ukraini
Institute of Internal Auditors. (2024). Global internal audit standards (Official Ukrainian translation). https://theiia.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/global-internal-audit-standards-ukrainian.pdf
Internal Audit Department of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. (2021). Procedure for conducting internal quality assessment of internal audit (Order No. 25, August 18, 2021).
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2017). Procedure for assessing the functioning of the internal audit system (Order No. 480, May 3, 2017). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0663-17#Text
KnowledgeLeader. (n.d.). Internal audit department key performance indicators (KPIs). https://www.knowledgeleader.com/tools/internal-audit-department-key-performance-indicators-kpis
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2020). Methodological guide for assessing the quality of internal audit in public authorities. https://mof.gov.ua/storage/files/%D0%9F%D0%9E%D0%A1%D0%86%D0%91%D0%9D%D0%98%D0%9A_%D0%9E%D0%AF_30_06_2020.pdf
PKC. (2025). Key performance indicators for internal audit: A practical guide. https://pkcindia.com/blogs/kpi-for-internal-audit/
Kanavets, M., Lykhach, Yu., Kukulia, A., et al. (2019). Tools for ensuring efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of public authorities’ activities (V. Kuprii, Ed.). Centre for Adaptation of the Civil Service to EU Standards. https://nads.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/5/18.05.2021/posibnyk-instrymentu.pdf
UN Sustainable Development Group. (2011). Results-based management. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/UNDG-RBM-Handbook-2012.pdf
United Nations Development Programme, Evaluation Office. (2007). Evaluation of results-based management in the United Nations Development Programme. https://erc.undp.org/evaluation/documents/download/1592
Decentralization in Ukraine. (2025). Online training course on results-based management. https://decentralization.ua/donors/surge/RBM
Institute of Internal Auditors. (2010). Measuring internal audit effectiveness and efficiency. https://www.theiia.org/globalassets/documents/content/articles/guidance/practice-guides/measuring-internal-audit-effectiveness-and-efficiency/practice-guide-measuring-internal-audit-effectiveness.pdf
Dittenhofer, M. (2001). Internal auditing effectiveness: An expansion of present methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(8), 443–450.
Chambers, R. F. (2017). Trusted advisors: Key attributes of outstanding internal auditors. Internal Audit Foundation.
Anderson, U. L., Head, M. J., Riddle, C., Sobel, P. J., et al. (2017). Internal auditing: Assurance & advisory services (4th ed.). Internal Audit Foundation.
Lenz, R., & Hahn, K. (2015). A contingency model of internal audit effectiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 43, 1–13.
Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2009). Identifying the drivers of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing, 13(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00392.x
Mihret, D. G., & Yismaw, A. W. (2007). Internal audit effectiveness: An Ethiopian public sector case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(5), 470–484.
Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.06.001
Dorosh, N. I. (2013). Evaluation of internal audit effectiveness: Theory and practice. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 147, 20–24.
Kamenska, T. O. (2011). Organization and methodology of internal audit in the enterprise management system. National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit.
Napadovska, L. V. (2014). Conceptual principles of internal audit effectiveness assessment. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit, (1–2), 76–81.
Abstract views: 43 PDF Downloads: 40
Copyright (c) 2025 Oleksandr Shpytal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).












