An Analytical Framework of Contemporary Hybrid Warfare: Lessons Learned from the Russia–Ukraine War
Abstract
Purpose. To conceptualize the operational characteristics of hybrid warfare by examining the Russia–Ukraine war as an empirical case study.
Method: Comparative analysis, and synthesis.
Findings. The empirical analysis shows that hybrid warfare is a systematic integration of non-military and military instruments within a multi-domain strategy. Russia combined cyber operations, information warfare, intelligence activities, economic pressure, psychological operations, and conventional forces to shape the operational environment. Non-military asymmetric measures constituted the initial and prolonged phase (2014–2022), aimed at undermining infrastructure, public trust, and international narratives; however, Ukraine’s cyber resilience prevented systemic collapse. Disinformation and psychological operations targeted political and military leadership to create uncertainty, but their effectiveness was limited by rapid fact-checking and strategic communication. Hybrid warfare also exploits institutional vulnerabilities (corruption, bribery, intimidation), yet anti-corruption measures and reforms helped contain these risks. Propaganda and bot networks were used to weaken social cohesion; however, counter-disinformation mechanisms helped maintain public trust. Further escalation involves more overt pressure through air, maritime, and proxy instruments. Intelligence operations and troop buildups preceded the invasion, but early mobilization and international cooperation reduced the element of surprise. Ultimately, hybrid warfare evolves into a multi-domain campaign involving missile strikes, electronic warfare, and unmanned systems, which Ukraine countered through layered air defense, interception technologies, and enhanced infrastructure resilience. Thus, hybrid warfare represents a continuum of integrated instruments of influence, the effectiveness of which can be limited by strong institutional capacity, cyber resilience, and international support.
Theoretical implications. The findings refine the conceptual understanding of hybrid warfare within security studies.
Practical implications. The results are relevant for policymakers and defense institutions addressing hybrid threats.
Paper type. Theoretical.
Downloads
References
Associated Press. (2024). Ukraine says corrupt officials stole $40 million meant to buy arms for the war with Russia. https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-russia-war-corruption-476d673cc64a4b005c7ee8ed5f5d5361
Alliance for Peacebuilding. (2024). Ukraine call to action: Combat mis/disinformation and promote cybersecurity in Ukraine and globally. https://www.allianceforpeacebuilding.org/ukraine-call-to-action-combat-misdisinformation-and-promote-cybersecurity-in-ukraine-and-globally
Atlamazoglou, S. (2024, October 31). Russia’s elite Spetsnaz special forces “devastated” in Ukraine war. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russias-elite-spetsnaz-special-forces-devastated-ukraine-war-213488
Bassett, L. (2025). Silicon shadow: The influence of big tech in Russo-Ukrainian cyber warfare. Cambridge Journal of Political Affairs, 5(1), 70–116. https://www.cambridgepoliticalaffairs.co.uk/2025/01/14/silicon-shadow/
Bernat, P. (2024). The evolution of Russian ISR satellite capabilities following the full-scale aggression on Ukraine (2022–2024) [Conference presentation]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386177279
Blakemore, C., & Mankovska, O. (2025). Internal corruption as a mechanism of hybrid occupation: Strategic dimensions of state capture. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400556966
BlackSeaNews. (2024, October 16). Review and database of Ukrainian attacks on the occupied Crimea, Russian ships and facilities on the Black Sea coast. https://www.blackseanews.net/en/read/223691
Boffey, D. (2023, August 11). Zelenskiy sacks military recruitment heads over frontline bribes scandal. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/11/zelenskiy-sacks-all-military-recruitment-heads-over-frontline-bribes-scandal-ukraine
Bowen, A. S. (2023). Russia’s war in Ukraine: Military and intelligence aspects (CRS Report R47068). Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47068
Bryjka, F. (2024). Russia intensifies disinformation offensive against Ukraine (PISM Bulletin No. 46). Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych. https://www.pism.pl/publications/russia-intensifies-disinformation-offensive-against-ukraine
Bryjka, F. (2023). Wagner group transforms in the wake of the war in Ukraine. Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych. https://pism.pl/publications/wagner-group-transforms-in-the-wake-of-the-war-in-ukraine
Burdiak, P. (2024). A malicious alliance: How cyberattacks and disinformation are synchronously destabilizing the digital space of Ukraine. Centre for Democracy and Rule of Law (CEDEM). https://cedem.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CEDEM_cyberdis_eng.pdf
Butterworth-Hayes, P. (2026, February 2). Ukraine’s counter-UAS interception rate fell from 84% in November to 81% in December. Unmanned Airspace. https://www.unmannedairspace.info/counter-uas-systems-and-policies/ukraines-counter-uas-interception-rate-fell-from-84-in-november-to-81-in-december/
Center for Countering Disinformation. (2023). About the Center for Countering Disinformation. https://cpd.gov.ua/en/docs/about-center-for-countering-disinformartion/
Center for Countering Disinformation. (2025). The Center held a press conference on the results of its work. https://cpd.gov.ua/en/events-en/the-center-held-a-press-conference-on-the-results-of-its-work/
Centre for Information Resilience. (2024, November 23). Open source investigators verify over 2,600 attacks on Ukraine’s hospitals, schools, churches and energy supply since Russian invasion. https://www.info-res.org/eyes-on-russia/articles/open-source-investigators-verify-over-2600-attacks-on-ukraines-hospitals-schools-churches-and-energy-supply-since-russian-invasion/
Centre for Strategic Communications and Information Security. (2023). How Russian special services mislead relatives of Ukrainian military. https://spravdi.org/en/how-russian-special-services-mislead-relatives-of-ukrainian-military/
Centre for Strategic Communications and Information Security. (2025, February 24). Poisonous narratives: How Russia’s information warfare strategy against Ukraine has evolved. Ukrinform. https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3965985-poisonous-narratives-how-russias-information-war
Chochtoulas, A. (2023). Insights from the Ukrainian cyber battlefield: Is the private sector a game changer? Joint Air Power Competence Centre. https://www.japcc.org/articles/insights-from-the-ukrainian-cyber-battlefield/
Detector Media. (2024). DisinfoChronicle: Kremlin disinformation daily chronicle – 19 September 2024. https://disinfo.detector.media/en/day/19-09-2024
Dukach, Y., Adam, I., & Furbish, M. (2025). Digital occupation: Pro-Russian bot networks target Ukraine’s occupied territories on Telegram. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report-russian-bot-networks-occupied-ukraine/
Dysa, Y. (2025, December 20). Escalating Russian airstrikes aim to cut Ukraine off from sea. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-hits-ports-bridge-escalating-strikes-ukraines-odesa-region-2025-12-20/
Eruygur, B. (2025). Medvedev says no-fly zone over Ukraine will mean NATO-Russia war. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr
Eruygur, B. (2023, August 17). Ukrainian president adopts decree dismissing regional military conscription officials. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr
ESET. (2022). IsaacWiper and HermeticWizard: New wiper and worm targeting Ukraine. https://www.welivesecurity.com/2022/03/01/isaacwiper-hermeticwizard-wiper-worm-targeting-ukraine/
Eurasia. (2024, October 17). Assessing Russian military adaptation in 2023. https://eurasia.ro/2024/10/17/assessing-russian-military-adaptation-in-2023/
Freedom House. (2022). Ukraine: Freedom on the Net 2022. https://freedomhouse.org/country/ukraine/freedom-net/2022
Freedom House. (2023). Ukraine: Freedom on the Net 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/country/ukraine/freedom-net/2023
Geissler, D., Bär, D., Pröllochs, N., & Feuerriegel, S. (2022). Russian propaganda on social media during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.04154
Górka, M. (2023). The Wagner Group as a tool of Russian hybrid warfare. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/15847239
Guner, E., Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2022). Theories of war in practice: Causes and termination. Wiedza Obronna. https://yadda.icm.edu.pl
Harward, C., Evans, A., Mappes, G., Gibson, O., Kagan, F. W., & Runkel, W. (2025). Russian offensive campaign assessment. Institute for the Study of War. https://www.understandingwar.org
Hirose, Y. (2025). Hybrid warfare transformed amidst the Ukraine war. https://ssdpaki.la.coocan.jp
Hunder, M. (2026, February 27). Ukraine may form joint ventures with allies to boost defenses. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com
Ilyushina, M. (2025, June 1). Ukraine attacks Russian air bases in drone strikes. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com
Institute of Naval Forces of Ukraine. (2023). Forced migration as a consequence of Russia’s hybrid war. https://ivms.mil.gov.ua
IntSecurity.org. (2023). Russia–Ukraine war newsletter (July 17–23, 2023). https://intsecurity.org
Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2020a). Early identification of threats. Social Development and Security, 10(4), 102–109.
Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2020b). Hybrid warfare as an instrument of political leverage. In M. Banasik et al. (Eds.), The Russian Federation and international security (pp. 117–136). Difin.
Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2020c). Hybrid warfare as a new type of war. In M. Banasik et al. (Eds.), The Russian Federation and international security (pp. 96–107). Difin.
Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2020d). The impact of social media on the war. In M. Banasik et al. (Eds.), Information, media, security environment (pp. 162–178). Difin.
Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2021). Deterrence as a component of response to hybrid threats. Civitas et Lex, 29(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.6124
Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2025). Coercion through threat and use of force. Przegląd Strategiczny, 18, 21–35. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl
Iskandarov, K., Gawliczek, P., & Soboń, A. (2024). Violation of territorial integrity as a tool of hybrid warfare. Security and Defence Quarterly, 45(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/174507
Iskandarov, K., Gawliczek, P., & Tomasik, J. (2022). Termination of war. Civitas et Lex, 35(3), 7–17.
Jędrysiak, M. (2024). Ukraine: Corruption scandal over fake disability certificates. OSW. https://www.osw.waw.pl
Jankowicz, M. (2023). Ukrainian man paid $5,000 to avoid conscription. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com
Knutson, J. (2022). Russia has conducted hundreds of cyberattacks against Ukraine. Axios. https://www.axios.com
Kramer, A. (2023, August 11). Ukraine fires recruitment chiefs after corruption probe. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com
Langston, V. (2026, February 18). Russia’s Doppelgänger operation. Medium. https://medium.com
Le Gargasson, C., & Black, J. (2025). Electromagnetic warfare. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org
Lewis, J. A. (2022). Cyber war and Ukraine. CSIS. https://www.csis.org
Loh, M. (2026, February 24). Ukraine uses interceptor drones. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com
Mansoor, P. R. (2012). Introduction: Hybrid warfare in history. In W. Murray & P. Mansoor (Eds.), Hybrid warfare. Cambridge University Press.
Marusyak, B. (2023). Russian redeployment of special forces. https://www.promoteukraine.org
Mihaylov, N. (2025). Cyber dimensions of hybrid warfare. CyberPeace Institute. https://cyberpeaceinstitute.org
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. (n.d.). Territorial defense forces. https://mod.gov.ua
National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine. (2025). Center for Countering Disinformation report. https://www.rnbo.gov.ua
Neville, S. B. (2015). Russia and hybrid warfare (Master’s thesis). Naval Postgraduate School.
Orenstein, M. (2022). Russia’s use of cyberattacks. FPRI. https://www.fpri.org
Petriv, O. (2024). Artificial intelligence and deepfakes. CEDEM. https://cedem.org.ua
Pusztaszeri, A., & Harding, E. (2025). Technological evolution on the battlefield. CSIS. https://www.csis.org
Rehan, T. (2025). AI-driven disinformation campaigns. Small Wars Journal.
Reuters. (2023). Russia-Ukraine war updates. https://www.reuters.com
Reuters. (2026). Russia attacked Ukraine with missiles and drones. https://www.reuters.com
Riehle, K. (2024). The Ukraine war and intelligence shift. Intelligence and National Security, 39(3), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2024.2322807
Riley-Smith, B. (2025). Russia targets Ukrainians through phones. The Times.
Romaniuk, R. (2024). Sea drones and Black Sea dominance. Ukrainska Pravda.
Schulze, M., & Kerttunen, M. (2023). Cyber operations in Russia’s war against Ukraine. SWP.
Smith, B. (2022). Defending Ukraine. Microsoft.
Spravdi. (2023). Strategic communication report. https://spravdi.org
Takagi, K. (2023). Intelligence revolution in Ukraine war. Hudson Institute.
The Guardian. (2025). Ukraine war briefing: Anti-corruption agency in Kyiv accuses deputy PM. https://www.theguardian.com
Tyshchenko, K. (2025). Ukraine uncovers bribery scheme. Ukrainska Pravda.
Ukrainska Pravda. (2022). Cyber warfare statistics. https://www.pravda.com.ua
Vakulina, S. (2025). Tackling Russia’s hybrid war. Euronews.
Welsch, M. (2025). Ukraine air war monitor (Vol. VIII). Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
Welsch, M. (2026). Ukraine air war monitor (Vol. XIII). Kyiv Dialogue.
WiFiTalents. (2026). Hybrid warfare statistics. https://wifitalents.com
Yakovenko, N. L., & Piskorska, H. (2023). Hybrid war of Russia against Ukraine. American History & Politics.
Zarembo, K., & Solodkyy, S. (2021). The evolution of Russian hybrid warfare: Ukraine. CEPA.
Abstract views: 0 PDF Downloads: 0
Copyright (c) 2026 Хаял Іскандаров, Елмеддін Алієв
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
