Interaction Between Border Details in the Unit’s Area of Responsibility

Keywords: Interaction, Border Patrol, Border Protection Unit, Coordination, Border Security

Abstract

Purpose. To provide a comprehensive substantiation of theoretical foundations and practical mechanisms for organizing interaction between border guard patrols within a unit’s area of responsibility, to identify systemic deficiencies in current practices, and to develop a formalized system of key performance indicators (KPIs) considering contemporary threats, combat experience, and digital transformation requirements.

Method. The research applies a combination of general scientific and empirical methods, including analysis and synthesis of regulatory and scientific sources, and a systems approach to conceptualize interaction as an integrated operational process. Empirical data were obtained through a structured survey of 32 officers of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine using a Likert scale. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach’s alpha (α = 0.81). Data processing included descriptive statistics, ranking, and content analysis using MS Excel and SPSS.

Findings. The concept of interaction between border patrols is refined as a coordinated process involving mutual information exchange, support, and shared responsibility. A three-level interaction model (tactical, operational, inter-agency) is proposed. Empirical results indicate a moderate effectiveness level (3.1/5.0), with key deficiencies related to insufficient digitalization, unclear responsibility boundaries, and limited communication intensity. The study demonstrates that the use of unmanned aerial systems reduces response time (8.3 vs. 14.2 minutes). A system of six KPIs is developed, focusing on both process and outcome dimensions.

Theoretical Implications. The study advances the conceptual framework of border security management by formalizing interaction metrics and integrating NATO and EU approaches into the national context.

Practical Implications. The proposed KPIs, digital monitoring tools, and standardized interaction protocols can enhance operational responsiveness and coordination efficiency.

Papertype. Empirical research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alberts, D. S., Garstka, J. J., & Stein, F. P. (2000). Network centric warfare: Developing and leveraging information superiority. CCRP Publication Series. https://dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_NCW.pdf

Androshchuk, V. M. (2019). Taktyka dii prykordonnykh nariadiv v osoblyvykh umovakh [Tactics of border patrol actions in special conditions]. NADPSU.

Bratko, A. V. (2022). Naukovo-metodychnyi aparat planuvannia operatyvno-sluzhbovoi diialnosti Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy [Scientific and methodological apparatus for planning the operational and service activity of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriia: Viiskovi ta tekhnichni nauky, (4), 5–25. https://nadpsu.edu.ua

Bratko, A. V., & Bilovskyi, O. S. (2025). Metodyka planuvannia operatyvno-sluzhbovoi diialnosti Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy [Methodology for planning the operational and service activity of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine]. Natsionalni interesy Ukrainy, 1(6), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1793-2025-1(6)-171-180

Burbela, S. V. (2022). Model pobudovy okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu na richkovii diliantsi [Model for organizing state border protection on a river section]. Social Development and Security, 12(1). https://paperssds.eu/index.php/JSPSDS

Collective of authors. (2022). Zastosuvannia bezpilotnykh aviatsiinykh kompleksiv u systemi okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu [Application of unmanned aerial systems in the state border protection system]. NADPSU.

Didenko, O. V. (2020). Upravlinnia pidrozdilamy prykordonnoi sluzhby v skladnykh umovakh operatyvnoi obstanovky [Management of border guard units in complex operational conditions]. NADPSU.

Frontex. (2021). Common core curriculum for border guard basic training in the European Union. https://frontex.europa.eu

Hrinchenko, V. V., & Androshchuk, O. S. (2021). Rozrobka analitychnoho metodu analizu efektyvnosti okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu iz zastosuvanniam ymovirnisno-statystychnoho pidkhodu [Development of an analytical method for analyzing the effectiveness of state border protection using a probabilistic-statistical approach]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu Povitrianykh Syl im. I. Kozheduba. Seriia: Systemy obrobky informatsii, (1), 6–11.

Kononenko, M. O., & Lienkov, S. V. (2021). Informatsiine zabezpechennia okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu iz zastosuvanniam suchasnykh tekhnichnykh zasobiv [Information support for state border protection using modern technical means]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NADPSU. Seriia: Viiskovi ta tekhnichni nauky, (2), 45–58.

Law of Ukraine No. 661-IV, On the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. (2003, April 3). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/661-15

Lutskyi, O. L., Bilovskyi, O. S., Bratko, A. V., Burbela, S. V., & Mysyk, A. B. (2022). Otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti operatyvno-sluzhbovoi diialnosti orhaniv okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu [Evaluating the effectiveness of the operational and service activity of state border protection bodies]. Sciences of Europe, (86)(2), 37–44.

Mykhailenko, O. V., & Palamarchuk, Yu. S. (2025). Metodyka roboty nachalnyka prykordonnoi zastavy shchodo upravlinnia operatyvno-sluzhbovoi diialnosti v umovakh pravovoho rezhymu voiennoho stanu [Methodology of the border outpost chief’s work on managing operational and service activities under martial law]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NADPSU, (1)(98), 46–56.

NATO Standardization Office. (2022). Allied Joint Publication AJP-3.2: Allied joint doctrine for land operations. https://nso.nato.int

Oliinyk, O. S. (2023). Suchasni pidkhody do orhanizatsii prykordonnoi okhorony v umovakh hibrydnykh zahroz [Modern approaches to the organization of border protection under hybrid threats]. Voienno-naukovyi visnyk, (39), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.33099/2707-1383-2023-39-201-215

Pikulski, S., & Mąkosa, R. (2020). Organizacja służby granicznej w warunkach strefy Schengen. WSPol.

President of Ukraine Decree No. 549/2006, Statute of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. (2006, June 19). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/549/2006

Prykhodko, Yu. I. (2018). Orhanizatsiia sluzhby pidrozdiliv okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu [Organization of the service of state border protection units]. NADPSU.

State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. (2022–2023). State border protection statistics. https://dpsu.gov.ua

Timchenko, A. V. (2022). Psykholohichni osnovy vzaiemodii osobovoho skladu prykordonnykh pidrozdiliv pry vykonanni sluzhbovo-boiovykh zavdan [Psychological foundations of interaction among personnel of border units in the performance of service and combat tasks]. Naukovyi visnyk NADPSU, (1)(87), 112–124.


Abstract views: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Synyshyn, M., & Chizh, V. (2026). Interaction Between Border Details in the Unit’s Area of Responsibility. Social Development and Security, 16(2), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2026.16.2.11
Section
Military Security