Analysis of CSR Impact on Private Sector Secondary School: A study in North and South Delhi (India)
Educational organizations in private sector require strong corporate strategies. In order to get success in the globally competitive environment they must adopt the strategy of Corporate Social Responsibility. This study analyzed corporate social responsibility and its impact on private sector secondary schools in district North & South Delhi. For this purpose primary data were collected through five point Likert’s scale. The questionnaire was fielded to private sector secondary school teachers in order to get data about the impact of corporate social responsibility on performance of secondary schools. The population of the study was 184 registered private sector secondary schools (140 boys and 44 girls) which included 900 teachers (who taught to class 10th students during session 2017-18) in district North & South Delhi. A sample of 280 teachers (140 male and 140 female) in 70 private sector secondary schools (35 for boys and 35 for girls) were selected through equal allocation sampling formula. Mean, Standard Deviation and t-test were applied for analyzing the data. The Pearson’s correlation r was used to evaluate the variable effects. The result from the data indicated that all the four aspects of CSR have positive significant impact on the performance of secondary schools.
Asrar-ul-Haq, M., Kuchinke, K. P. & Iqbal, A. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Case of Indian higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2352-2363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.04
Branco, M. C. & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132. https://ideas.repec.org › kap › jbuset › v69y2006i2p111-132
Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform (2009). Corporate responsibility report, London: HM Government.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three Dimensional Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
CORE (2012). CORE Values: Why the UK Needs a Commission for Business, Human Rights and the Environment’, The Corporate Responsibility Coalition. Available from http://corporate-responsibility.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CORE values.pdf (Accessed 30 August, 2012).
Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions. Published online in Wiley Inter Science, 1-13. www.interscience.wiley.com. DOI: 10.1002/csr.132.
European Commission Brussels (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
Freeman, I. & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: the Vision of Four Nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 419–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0688-6
Filho, S. J. M., Wanderley, L. S. O., Gomez, C. P. & Farache, F. (2010). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Management for Competitive Advantage. 7 (3), 294-309. BAR-Brazil Administration Review On-line version ISSN 1807-7692.
Galbreath, J. (2010). How does Corporate Social Responsibility benefit Firms? Evidence from Australia. European Business Review, 22 (4), 411-431. doi.10.1108/09555341011056186.
Garavan, N. T. & McGuire, D. (2010). Human Resource Development and Society: Human Resource Development’s Role in Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Ethics in Organizations. Advances in Developing Human Resources Sage Publications, 12 (5), 487-507.doi.org/10.1177/1523422310394757.
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003) (2003). Educational Research London: Competencies for Analysis and applications (7th Ed.). Upper Saddler River, NJ: Merrill Printice Hall.
Goia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Institutional identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sense making during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393936
Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives. Higher Education 39, 67–91.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academic Management Review, 20 (4), 986-1014. doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9512280033
Maignan, I. & Ferrell, O. (2000). Measuring Corporate Citizenship in two Countries; The Case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23 (3), 283-297. doi.org/10.1023/A:1006262325211.
Mangal, S. K.(2004), An Introduction to Psychology. Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Limited.
McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. Doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4011987.
Melewar, T. C. & Akel, S. (2005). The Role of Corporate Identity in the Higher Education Sector A Case Study.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10 (1), 41–57. ISSN 1356-3289. doi:10.1108/13563280510578196
Mohammad, B., Bakar, H. A. & Rahman, N. A. A. (2007). Relationship between Corporate Identity and Corporate Reputation: A Case of a Malaysian Higher Education Sector. Journal Manajemen Pemasaran, 2(2), 81-89.
Praveena, T. & Vijaya, K. T. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility in Education: A Case Study of Hetero Group. 4th Int'l Conference on Research in Humanities, Sociology & Corporate Social Responsibility (RHSCSR’15) Sept. 25-26, 2015 Penang (Malaysia). http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/ICEHMED915011
Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 1-15. https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society-the-link-between-competitive-advantage-and-corporate-social-responsibility.
Serap Atakan M. G. & Eker T. (2007). Corporate Identity of a Socially Responsible University– A Case from the Turkish Higher Education Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1) 55–68. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-006-9274-3
Smith, A. D. (2007). Making the Case for the Competitive Advantage of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Strategy Series, 8 (3), 186-195.
Stensaker, B. (2007). The Relationship between Branding and Organizational Change. Higher Education Management and Policy. 19 (1), 13-29.
Yunus, M. & Weber, K. (2009). Creating a World Without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism, New York: Public Affairs.
Abstract views: 194 PDF Downloads: 77