New Trends In Azerbaijan's Foreign Policy

Keywords: Second Karabakh War, Geopolitical Protectionism, Tectonic Shift, Altruism, C5 1

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the impact of the geopolitical transformation that took place in the South Caucasus after the Second Karabakh War on Azerbaijan's foreign policy course.

Method. Analysis-synthesis, historical, systematic approach, cause-and-effect.

Findings. The article explains the transition of Azerbaijan’s foreign policy course from a passive and defense-oriented policy to a more active, balanced, and multi-vector policy after the Second Karabakh War. These innovations are justified by the tectonic shift towards Central Asia, the increase in initiatives at the subregional and international levels, the strengthening of a pragmatic, proactive and multipolar foreign policy line, and the rise of altruistic tendencies.

Theoretical implications. Azerbaijan’s contemporary foreign policy combines realism, liberalism, and constructivism: prioritizing sovereignty and power, recognizing the importance of economic interdependence and cooperation, and orienting toward norms of stable coexistence. At the same time, the liberal-constructivist vector is strengthening through the development of mutually beneficial regional cooperation, particularly with Armenia, which creates a foundation of trust. The country’s peace policy extends beyond the regional level, as evidenced by its participation in international peace initiatives.

Practical implications. Azerbaijan’s modern foreign policy successes have led to the strengthening of the country’s sovereignty, its rise to a leading position in the region, and its increasing influence in the international arena. These successes create a solid foundation for future development and further strengthen Azerbaijan’s strategic importance.

Value. The study’s value lies in systematizing changes in Azerbaijan’s foreign policy within a conceptual framework that substantiates multi-vector policy, balanced diplomacy, and a focus on national interests, thereby strengthening its theoretical dimension. It also analyzes the state’s behavior in regional and global contexts—especially after the Second Karabakh War—explaining mechanisms of adaptation to the evolving international system. Attention to logistics diplomacy, regional cooperation, and relations with the United States links practical outcomes with scholarly arguments, enhancing both academic and applied significance.

Paper type. Theoretical.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Najafov, Z. N. (2025). New geopolitical features of the South Caucasus region. Social Development and Security, 15(6), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.6.7

Seyidov, C. (2022). Post-war vectors of South Caucasus geopolitics. Civilization Journal, (4), 28–36. https://civilization-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/images/Sivilizasiya%202022-4.pdf

Pukhov, R. N. (Ed.). (2021). Burya na Kavkaze [Storm in the Caucasus]. Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies.

Zbigniew Brzezinski. (2013). The great chessboard: America’s hegemony and its geostrategic imperatives. Astrel.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (2025, December 26). Press release on the results of 2025. https://mfa.gov.az/files/file/Yekun-2025/Metbuat%20buraxilisi%20-%202025%20%2826.12.2025%29%20AZ-Yekun.pdf

Azerbaijan News. (n.d.). Zangezur corridor – A project that creates new opportunities for cooperation on a regional and global scale. https://www.azerbaijan-news.az/az/posts/detail/zengezur-dehlizi-regional-ve-global-mikyasda-yeni-emekdasliq-imkanlari-yaradan-layihe-1767905887/379582

Azerbaijan News. (n.d.). Azerbaijan’s growing role and influence in the global peace agenda. https://www.azerbaijan-news.az/index.php/az/posts/detail/qlobal-sulh-gundeliyinde-azerbaycanin-artan-rolu-ve-nufuzu-1771886520/383291


Abstract views: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Nuri Najafov, Z., & Seyidov, J. (2026). New Trends In Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy. Social Development and Security, 16(2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2026.16.2.3
Section
National Security