Formation of Safety Culture Among University Students: Educational and Behavioral Perspectives
Abstract
Purpose. To examine the level of safety culture formation and behavioral attitudes of higher education students, as well as to analyze their perceptions of risks and the prioritization of safety in professional activities.
Method. The study was conducted through a survey of fourth-year students from various faculties at the beginning of the course “Life Safety and Occupational Health”. A questionnaire with statements grouped by key aspects of safety culture was used. Responses were recorded on a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) were applied for data analysis. The interpretation of results was based on the Bradley curve concept. Additionally, a multicriteria approach was used to evaluate decision-making in situations involving trade-offs between safety and other professional factors.
Findings. The findings revealed heterogeneity in students’ perceptions of safety and varying levels of safety culture components. The highest scores were observed in compliance with safety regulations, indicating the dominance of a formal approach. At the same time, lower scores related to personal responsibility suggest insufficient internal motivation for risk management. Some respondents tend to perceive accidents as random events. However, a relatively high level of awareness of personal responsibility for maintaining a safe environment was identified. The analysis of situational tasks showed that students often prioritize work quality and deadlines, while urgency and organizational pressure may encourage risk-taking behavior. Overall, the group is at a transitional stage toward a more proactive safety culture.
Practical Implications. The results can be used to improve educational programs and develop behavioral competencies in the field of safety.
Paper type: Theoretical and applied research.
Downloads
References
Amyotte, P., Khan, F., & Rezaei, M. (2017). Lessons learned from major chemical accidents and incidents: Analysis methods and findings. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 49, 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.026
Arezes, P. M., & Swuste, P. (2012). Occupational health and safety post-graduation courses in Europe: A general overview. Safety Science, 50(3), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.003
Bartnicka, J., Kabiesz, P., & Wąsowicz, K. (2021). Evaluation of the effectiveness of employers and H&S services in relation to the COVID-19 system in Polish manufacturing companies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179302
Cooper, M. D. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research, 35(5), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004
Dee, S. J., Cox, B. L., & Ogle, R. A. (2015). Process safety in the classroom: The current state of chemical engineering programs at US universities. Process Safety Progress, 34(4), 316–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11732
van Dijk, F. J., Bubas, M., & Smits, P. B. (2015). Evaluation studies on education in occupational safety and health: Inspiration for developing economies. Annals of Global Health, 81(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.023
Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2024). What is competence? UK Health and Safety Executive. https://www.hse.gov.uk/competence/what-is-competence.htm
Hoffmeister, K., Gibbons, A. M., Johnson, S. K., Cigularov, K. P., Chen, P. Y., & Rosecrance, J. C. (2014). The differential effects of transformational leadership facets on employee safety. Safety Science, 62, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.004
Ho, C. L., & Dzeng, R.-J. (2010). Construction safety training via e-learning: Learning effectiveness and user satisfaction. Computers & Education, 55(2), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.017
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., & Regnér, P. (2014). Exploring strategy: Text and cases (10th ed.). Pearson.
Leisztner, P., Farago, F., & Szabo, G. (2024). The competencies and tasks of workers’ representatives in the field of occupational safety and health: A systematic literature review. IETI Transactions on Ergonomics and Safety, 8(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.6722/TES.202412_8(2).0003
Loosemore, M., & Malouf, N. (2019). Safety training and positive safety attitude formation in the Australian construction industry. Safety Science, 113, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.029
Malekpoura, A., Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2024). The effect of intervention programs on road traffic injury prevention among adolescents and young people: A systematic review. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 31(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2023.2286639
Miles, R., Tadesse, S., & Nguyen, P. (2024). The leading role of expert safety knowledge in supporting the mission of caring for patients during man-made and natural disasters: State of emergency medicine in Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Ukraine. International Journal of Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00609-1
Pysarevska, S., Yaremko, Z., Tymoshuk, S., & Vashchuk, V. (2024). Socially responsible behaviour of a pedestrian − Obligation or necessity? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 105, 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.003
Qian, Y., Vaddiraju, S., & Khan, F. (2023). Safety education 4.0 – A critical review and a response to the process industry 4.0 need in chemical engineering curriculum. Safety Science, 161, 106069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106069
Rey-Becerra, E., Barrero, L. H., Ellegast, R., & Kluge, A. (2021). The effectiveness of virtual safety training in work at heights: A literature review. Applied Ergonomics, 94, 103419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103419
Rundmo, T. (2000). Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in Norsk Hydro. Safety Science, 34(1–3), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00006-6
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
Tymoshuk, S. V., Pysarevska, S. V., Petryshyn, R. S., & Yaremko, Z. M. (2023). Social responsibility for the safety and health of employees at work. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2023-2/113
Tymoshuk, S. V., Popovich, S. I., & Kit, L. Ya. (2025). The employee as a subject in the formation of a safe professional space. Sotsialʹni tekhnolohiyi: aktualʹni problemy teoriyi ta praktyky, 105, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.32782/2707-9147.2024.105.11
Tsopa, V., Bolibrykh, B., Kolesnik, V., Cheberyachko, S., Deryugin, O., & Sharovatova, O. (2024). The relationship between the stages of organizational development and the level of occupational safety culture. Social Development and Security, 14(6), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2024.14.6.14
Wu, C., Huang, X., & Wang, B. (2023). Glimpse of safety science development in China: A review of safety fundamental research and construction of six new postgraduate courses. Safety Science, 169, 106323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106323
Wybo, J.-L., & van Wassenhove, W. (2016). Preparing graduate students to be HSE professionals. Safety Science, 81, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.013
Zohar, D., & Polachek, T. (2017). Organizational culture and a safety-conscious work environment: The mediating role of employee communication satisfaction. Journal of Safety Research, 61, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.005
Zhang, J., Fu, J., Hao, H., Chen, N., Zhang, W., & Kim, Y.-C. (2018). Development of safety science in Chinese higher education. Safety Science, 106, 92–103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925753516302685?via%3Dihub
Abstract views: 0 PDF Downloads: 0
Copyright (c) 2026 Світлана Тимошук, Соломія Писаревська, Любов Кіт
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
