Developing Cross-Cultural Competence of Special Operations Forces Officers as a Factor of Operational Effectiveness: Evidence from an Experimental Study
Abstract
Purpose. To experimentally verify the impact of a conceptual model for developing cross-cultural competence, based on digital and AI-driven technologies, on the operational effectiveness of Special Operations Forces officers.
Method. The research was conducted as a pedagogical experiment using both quantitative and qualitative methods, including testing, questionnaires, observation, expert assessment, and statistical analysis. The sample consisted of experimental and control groups of officers (22 participants each). During the formative stage, the author’s “Shadow Network” training program with digital simulation tools was implemented.
Findings. The experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the integrated cross-cultural competence indicator compared to the control group. The greatest improvements were observed in sociocultural sensitivity, adaptability, communication skills, empathy, and conflict-resolution abilities. The Mann–Whitney U test confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.
Theoretical implications. The study expands the conceptual understanding of the structure of cross-cultural competence among SOF officers and substantiates the possibility of its targeted development through digital educational technologies.
Practical implications. The proposed model and training program can be integrated into Special Operations Forces officer training systems to enhance operational effectiveness in multicultural environments.
Value. The results confirm the effectiveness of integrating digital technologies into Special Operations Forces officer training and substantiate the relationship between cross-cultural competence development and enhanced operational capability in multicultural environments.
Downloads
References
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Koh, C. (2006). Personality correlates of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601105275267
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x
Crowne, K. A. (2013). Cultural exposure, emotional intelligence, and cultural intelligence: An exploratory study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 13(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595812452631
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
Deardorff, D. K. (Ed.). (2009). The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence. Sage Publications.
Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford University Press.
Earley, P. C., Ang, S., & Tan, J. S. (2006). CQ: Developing cultural intelligence at work. Stanford University Press.
Johnson, W. B., & Anderson, J. P. (2018). Cultural competence and military operations. Military Review, 98(2), 64–73.
MacNulty, C. (2012). Human terrain: War becomes academic. World Policy Journal, 29(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0740277512444181
McFate, M. (2005). Anthropology and counterinsurgency: The strange story of their curious relationship. Military Review, 85(2), 24–38.
Paige, R. M. (Ed.). (2013). Education for the intercultural experience. Intercultural Press.
Rehg, M. T., Gundlach, M. J., & Grigorian, R. A. (2012). Examining the influence of cross-cultural training on cultural intelligence and specific self-efficacy. Cross Cultural Management, 19(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601211219892
Selmeski, B. R. (2007). Military cross-cultural competence: Core concepts and individual development. Royal Military College of Canada.
Soeters, J., Poponete, C., & Page, J. (2008). Culture’s consequences in the military. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595808096670
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Nielsen, T. M. (2007). Cultural intelligence. In S. Clegg & J. Bailey (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organization studies. Sage.
Voss, J., & Steger, T. (2017). Cultural intelligence and leadership effectiveness in multinational military teams. Armed Forces & Society, 43(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X15626791
Wisecarver, M., et al. (2012). Cross-cultural competence in Army leaders: A conceptual and empirical foundation. U.S. Army Research Institute.
Wunderle, W. D. (2006). Through the lens of cultural awareness: A primer for U.S. armed forces deploying to Arab and Middle Eastern countries. Combat Studies Institute Press.
Kaminska, O. V. (2022). Psykholoho-pedahohichni aspekty rozvytku kulturnoho intelektu (CQ) u viiskovosluzhbovtsiv Syl spetsialnykh operatsii [Psychological and pedagogical aspects of cultural intelligence (CQ) development among Special Operations Forces personnel]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii, 11(24), 132–145.
Korol, N. O. (2021). Formuvannia mizhkulturnoi komunikatyvnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh ofitseriv u protsesi vyvchennia humanitarnykh dystsyplin [Formation of intercultural communicative competence of future officers in the process of studying humanities] (Doctoral dissertation). Khmelnytskyi.
Lazorenko, S. V., & Siverskyi, A. I. (2022). Metodyka formuvannia sotsiokulturnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh ofitseriv u systemi viiskovoi osvity [Methodology for forming sociocultural competence of future officers in the military education system]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu oborony Ukrainy, 4(68), 85–92.
Safian, O. O. (2021). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti formuvannia kros-kulturnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh fakhivtsiv sotsionomichnykh profesii [Psychological features of cross-cultural competence formation of future socionomic specialists]. Helvetyka.
Sierykh, H. H. (2023). Pedahohichni umovy pidhotovky ofitseriv do mizhkulturnoi vzaiemodii u mizhnarodnykh myrotvorchykh operatsiiakh [Pedagogical conditions for training officers for intercultural interaction in international peacekeeping operations]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky, 2(33), 144–158.
Torichnyi, O. V. (2021). Systema formuvannia mizhkulturnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh ofitseriv-mahistriv u vyshchykh viiskovykh navchalnykh zakladakh [System of intercultural competence formation of future master’s-level officers in higher military educational institutions] (Doctoral dissertation). Khmelnytskyi.
Khadzhyradieva, S. K., & Torichnyi, O. V. (2024). Kros-kulturna pidhotovka viiskovykh fakhivtsiv v umovakh yevroatlantychnoi intehratsii: eksperymentalna perevirka efektyvnosti [Cross-cultural training of military specialists in the context of Euro-Atlantic integration: Experimental verification of effectiveness]. Nauka i tekhnika Povitrianykh Syl Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy, 1(54), 112–119.
Yahupov, V. V., & Svystun, V. I. (2022). Metodolohiia doslidzhennia profesiinoi kompetentnosti viiskovykh fakhivtsiv: systemnyi pidkhid [Methodology of professional competence research of military specialists: A systemic approach]. Profesiina osvita: problemy i perspektyvy, 22, 7–15.
Abstract views: 51 PDF Downloads: 24
Copyright (c) 2025 Hanna Krasota
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
