Ways and techniques of combating guided aerial bombs in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war
Abstract
Purpose: is to form views on the search and selection of methods and techniques for combating guided aerial bombs in the modern context of the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war.
Method: the main methods of research are methods of analysis and synthesis, methods of induction and deduction, methods of expert survey.
Findings: are: determination of the main tactical and technical characteristics of guided air bombs, as well as the principles of their application in the modern context; the results of the analysis of the literature on the subject of countermeasures against guided aerial bombs; analysis of aerial guided bombs that are in Russia's arsenal; a comparative quantitative expert assessment of the tactical and technical characteristics of guided air bombs that are in service with Russia; the main methods and methods of combating guided aerial bombs are defined; recommendations for arming the F-16 to combat guided aerial bombs and their carriers in the event of their transfer to Ukraine.
Theoretical implications: the theoretical value of the article consists in determining the main views on the search for effective methods and techniques of combating guided aerial bombs in the modern context of the Russian-Ukrainian war.
Paper type: theoretical, descriptive, practical, methodical.
Downloads
References
Semenenko, O., Semenenko, L., Chernyshova, I., Moskalenko, I., Kharitonov, K., & Koverga, V. (2021). Features of the influence of wars and military conflicts on the national economy of the state. Social Development and Security, 11(1), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2021.11.1.18
Petrov, V. (2020). Analysis of the effectiveness of countermeasures against guided aerial bombs in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Kharkiv. East, 72 p.
Johnson, M. (2019). Advanced Techniques in Countering Guided Munitions: Lessons from Modern Warfare. Washington, D.C.: Defense Analysis Institute, 110 p.
Brown, A. (2018). Air Defense Systems in Modern Conflicts: Case Studies and Analysis. New York: Strategic Studies Institute, 95 p.
Sydorenko, I. (2019). Tactical techniques in the fight against guided aerial bombs. Lviv. Light, 45 p.
Smith, J. (2017). Countermeasures against Guided Aviation Bombs: Case Studies from Recent Conflicts. London. Military Publishing House, 90 p.
Kovalchuk, I. (2022). Evolution and problems of combating guided aerial bombs in Ukrainian military doctrine. Lviv. Polygraph, 78 p.
Adams, R. (2016). Defending Against Precision-Guided Munitions: Lessons Learned from Recent Conflicts. Canberra: Defense Science Institute, 80 p.
Martinez, G. (2018). Strategies for Countering Guided Bomb Attacks: Insights from Military History. Arlington: Defense Studies Press, 100 pages.
Vasiliev, O. (2021). The fight against guided aerial bombs: the experience of the Russian army. Moscow. Voenizdat, 65 p.
Thompson, P. (2019). Defensive Tactics Against Guided Aerial Bombs: Case Studies and Best Practices. Sydney: Defense Research Institute, 85 p.
Koval, O. (2023). Security in the air space: challenges and strategies of Ukraine. Kyiv: Institute of Strategic Studies, 60 p.
Kim, S. (2017). Countermeasures against Guided Bomb Attacks: Lessons from the Korean Peninsula. Seoul: Institute of Military Studies, 75 pages.
Nguyen, T. (2018). Challenges and Strategies in Dealing with Guided Aerial Bombardments: Insights from Vietnam. Hanoi: Institute of Defense Studies, 70 p.
Lee, J. (2020). Technology Innovations in Anti-Aircraft Defense: Case Studies and Future Prospects. Singapore: Defense Technology Institute, 85 p.
Ivanenko, O. (2017). The use of guided manned aerial bombs in military operations: the experience of Ukraine. Kyiv. Ukroboronprom, 64 p.
Petrenko V. (2020). Strategies and tactics of using guided manned aerial bombs in modern conflicts. Kharkiv. East, 78 p.
Johnson, M. (2018). The Role of Guided Pilot Aircraft Bombs in Modern Warfare: Case Studies and Analysis. London: Military Publishing House, 90 p.
Smith, J. (2019). Utilization of Precision-Guided Pilot Bombs in the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict: A Comparative Study. Washington, D.C.: Defense Analysis Institute, 100 p.
Koval, V., Semenenko, O., Baranov, S., Ostrovsky, S., Akinina, T., Dobrovolskyi, Yu. (2023). Modern views on the acquisition of technological advantage in the course of repelling large-scale armed aggression, taking into account the proportionality of adversary countries. Social development and security, 13 (6), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2023.13.6.5
Ivanov, O. (2018). The fight against guided aerial bombs: the experience of Ukraine. Kyiv. Ukroboronprom, 56 p.
A record number of strikes on the Kherson region: what is known about Russiaʼs guided aerial bombs. Available from: https://24tv.ua/shho-take-kerovani-aviatsiyni-bombi-rosiyi-harakteristiki-dalnist_n2292628#1
Abstract views: 92 PDF Downloads: 85
Copyright (c) 2024 Oleh Semenenko, Volodymyr Koval, Serhii Baranov, Yuzef Dobrovolskyi, Alevtyna Hetman, Serhii Mytchenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
