Peculiarities of the situation and problematic issues of the use of border units in the context of a stabilization operation

  • Valeriy Kit Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine
  • Olexandr Beka Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine
  • Ivan Lukovskyi Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine
Keywords: state border, situation, stabilization operation, sabotage and reconnaissance group

Abstract

Purpose: to summarize the peculiarities of the situation on the northeastern section of the state border in the context of the stabilization operation and problematic issues of countering sabotage and reconnaissance groups of the enemy.

Method: system analysis, generalization, synthesis.

Findings: an analysis of the experience of using border units to counteract enemy sabotage and reconnaissance groups on the Russian-Ukrainian border.

Theoretical implications: includes several key aspects that are important for understanding and solving current problems, namely, analysis of stabilization operations, study of the peculiarities of the work of border units, identification of problematic issues, development of recommendations for the head of the border unit and increase of the level of security and control.

Practical value of the study: includes a number of aspects that can be useful for practical activities in the field of security and management, namely, increasing the effectiveness of crisis response, improving cooperation and coordination of activities, ensuring the safety of citizens and territory, as well as the development of technological solutions.

Originality: it studies specific aspects of the work of border units in the context of stabilization operations, which is important in the context of ensuring security and effective management of border areas in conditions of instability.

Paper type: theoretical.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tomchuk O. I., Mokoivets V. I., Fedorov O. Yu. Spilne zastosuvannia pidrozdiliv Sukhoputnykh viisk ta Natsionalnoi hvardii Ukrainy u stabilizatsiinykh diiakh viisk. Sluzhbovo-boiova diialnist Natsionalnoi hvardii Ukrainy: suchasnyi stan, problemy ta perspektyvy : naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia Natsionalnoi akademii Natsionalnoi hvardii Ukrainy 31 bereznia 2022 r., m. Kharkiv. S. 78-80.

Pievtsov H. V., Dzeverin I. H., Usachova O. A., Burkovskyi S. I., Novichonok S. M. (2020). Metodyka rozrakhunku potreby na pidhotovku ta spetsialne vykorystannia aerodromiv tsyvilnoi aviatsii, aerodromnykh dilianok dorih, polovykh aerodromiv [Methodology for calculating the need for preparation and special use of civil aviation airfields, airfield sections of roads, field airfields]. Nauka i tekhnika Povitrianykh Syl Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy, KhNUPS, Kharkiv, 2020, № 3(40). S. 79-90.

Bekirov A. E., Yashchenko V. Zh., Kreidun O. S. (2019). Stehanohrafichnyi metod na osnovi bezposerednoho ta nepriamoho vbudovuvannia danykh dlia oblastei zobrazhennia z riznoiu nasychenistiu [A steganographic method based on direct and indirect data embedding for image regions with different saturation]. Modern Information Technologies in the Sphere of Security and Defence № 1(34)/2019. S. 115-120. https://DOI.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2019-34-1-115-120.

Horodnov V. P., Binkovskyi O. A., Kukin I. (2008). Taksonomichna protsedura formuvannia systemy oznak dlia vyiavlennia pravoporushen pry peretynanni hromadianamy derzhavnoho kordonu poza punktamy propusku [Taxonomic procedure for the formation of a system of signs for the detection of offenses when citizens cross the state border outside checkpoints]. Chest i zakon. Kharkiv 2008. № 1. C. 40–44.

Horodnov V. P., Kyrylenko V. A., Karataiev R. H. (2009). Model vyznachennia ymovirnosti provedennia dyversiino-rozviduvalnykh i terorystychnykh operatsii u mistsiakh (raionakh) vidpovidalnosti orhaniv okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu [Model for determining the probability of sabotage, intelligence and terrorist operations in places (districts) of responsibility of the state border protection authorities]. Chest i zakon. Kharkiv 2009. № 1. C. 41–45.

Horodnov V. P., Kyrylenko V. A., Petrov V. O. (2016). Pokaznyk otsinky ryzykiv prykordonnoho kontroliu v avtomobilnykh punktakh propusku cherez derzhavnyi kordon Ukrainy [Indicator of risk assessment of border control at automobile checkpoints across the state border of Ukraine]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu Povitrianykh Syl. Kharkiv 2016. No 2(47). S. 212–215.

Horodnov V. P., Kyrylenko V. A, Kurashkevych A. P. Rozrobka modeli otsinky prypustymoi tryvalosti vykorystannia informatsii dlia pryiniattia rishen na okhoronu derzhavnoho kordonu iz urakhuvanniam yii starinnia y znyzhennia virohidnosti [Development of a model for assessing the acceptable duration of information use for decision-making on the protection of the state border, taking into account its aging and decrease in probability]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu Povitrianykh Syl. Kharkiv, 2012. No 1(30).

Mysyk A. B., Andrushko O. V. Model identyfikatsii dyversiino-rozviduvalnoi hrupy pry sprobi peretynu derzhavnoho kordonu [Model of identification of a sabotage and intelligence group when attempting to cross the state border] : zb. naukovykh pr. Nats. akademii prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriia : Viiskovi ta tekhnichni nauky. 2020. № 83. S. 190–203.

Farion O. B., Androshchuk O. S., Radionov H. O. (2021). Rekomendatsii shchodo provedennia spetsialnykh zakhodiv dlia borotby z dyversiino-rozviduvalnymy hrupamy v umovakh vysokoi ymovirnosti vohnevoho urazhennia protyvnykom [Recommendations for carrying out special measures to combat subversive and reconnaissance groups in conditions of high probability of fire damage by the enemy] : zb. naukovykh pr. Nats. akademii prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriia : Viiskovi ta tekhnichni nauky. 2021. № 4(86)2021. S. 112–128.

“Shchomisiatsia vorozhi dyversiino-rozviduvalnykh hrup po 9-10 raziv probuiut zakhodyty na terytoriiu Chernihivshchyny ta Sumshchyny” [Every month, enemy sabotage and reconnaissance groups try to enter the territory of Chernihiv Oblast and Sumy Oblast at least 10 times], – Komanduvach Obiednanykh syl Zbroinykh syl Ukrainy heneral-leitenant Serhii NAIeV. Available from : https://lb.ua/society/2023/11/07/583175_shchomisyatsya_vorozhi_drg_910_raziv.html.

VKP 1-00(01).01 : slovnyk viiskovykh terminiv ta skorochen (abreviatur) [dictionary of military terms and abbreviations (abbreviations)]. Available from : http://surl.li/ovvnr.

Shynkarenko I. R., Podzolkova T. Yu. Pravovi ta metodolohichni problemy shchodo vyiavlennia chleniv rosiiskykh dyversiino-rozviduvalnykh hrup pid chas voiennoho vtorhnennia [Legal and methodological problems regarding the identification of members of Russian sabotage and intelligence groups during a military invasion]. Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. 2022. № 2. S. 21-28. https://DOI.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2022-2-21-28.


Abstract views: 47
PDF Downloads: 26
Published
2024-02-29
How to Cite
Kit, V., Beka, O., & Lukovskyi, I. (2024). Peculiarities of the situation and problematic issues of the use of border units in the context of a stabilization operation. Social Development and Security, 14(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2024.14.1.2
Section
National and Military Security