Modern views on the acquisition of technological advantage in the course of repelling large-scale armed aggression, taking into account the proportionality of adversary countries
Abstract
Purpose: to form modern views on the acquisition of technological advantage in the course of repelling large-scale armed aggression, taking into account the proportionality of the adversary countries, with an emphasis on the need for the formation of technological advantage of Ukraine in the war against Russia as the main way to resolve the conflict.
Method: the main methods of research are methods of analysis and synthesis, methods of induction and deduction, methods of expert survey.
Findings: the main aspects of research on the acquisition of technological advantage are determined, taking into account the main challenges and limitations regarding the proportionality of opposing countries; the main requirements and principles for ensuring technological superiority over the enemy during the repulsion of large-scale armed aggression using the principle of proportionality of enemy countries were formed; formed views regarding the acquisition of a technological advantage over the enemy in the course of repelling large-scale armed aggression in the Russian-Ukrainian war in the multi-domain space; the main properties of modern wars and their manifestation in the context of the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war are revealed; the predicted consequences of the third world war for the countries of the world are determined, and recommendations are made to reduce the probability of its occurrence.
Theoretical implications: the theoretical value of the article consists in determining the formation of the main modern views on the acquisition of technological advantage in the course of repelling large-scale armed aggression, taking into account the proportionality of the adversary countries, with an emphasis on the need for the formation of technological advantage of Ukraine in the war against Russia.
Paper type: methodical.
Downloads
References
Thomas Mahnken. (2008). Technology and the American Way of War Since 1945. USA. Columbia University Press. P. 300.
Martin C. Libicki. (2009). Technology and War: From 2000 B.C. to the Present. USA. The National Interest. P. 20.
Semenenko, O., Butenko, R., Abramova, M., Koverga, V., Motrunych, I., & Chuhui, H. (2021). On the question of evaluating the sufficiency of human resources of Ukraine to ensure the necessary level of defense capacity and the military-economic security of the state. Social Development and Security, 11(6), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2021.11.6.17
Shiryaev V. (2020). Technological challenges for modern armies. Military-industrial courier. Ukraine. P. 10.
Richard Overy. (1995). Why the Allies Won USA. W. W. Norton & Company. P. 396.
Shamiotis I. (2018). The role of technology in military conflicts. Ukraine. Kyiv. "Akademiya" publishing house. P. 150.
John Arquilla, David Ronfeldt. (1997). In Athena's Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age. USA. RAND Corporation. P. 240.
Семененко О.М., Корнійчук С.П., Бокій В.Г., Каблуков О.А. Сучасні особливості військово-економічного забезпечення та оцінка необхідного рівня обороноздатності України // SDirect 24 – Безпека, суспільство, наука. 2020. № 2 (12). Р. 51–76. Available from : https://www.sdirect24.org/kopia-nato-deep-no-13.
Edward N. Luttwak. (2001). Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace. USA. Harvard University Press. P. 304.
Hirkalo I. (2016). Technological military revolution and its impact on ensuring national security. Ukraine. Kyiv. "ArtEk" publishing house. P. 200.
Barry R. Posen. "The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars" (1984). USA. Cornell University Press. P. 408.
Andriy Tarasenko. (2020). Cyber security and military conflicts: technological and strategic aspects Ukraine. Kyiv. "Technique" publishing house. P. 180.
Meltyukhov M. (2007). Tank battles of the Second World War: myths and reality. Ukraine. Kyiv. "Interpress" publishing house. P. 368.
Michael E. O'Hanlon. (2000). Technological Change and the Future of Warfare. USA. Brookings Institution Press. P. 192.
Zalozna M. (2015). Cyber warfare: theoretical and practical aspects. Ukraine. Kyiv. "Logos" publishing house. P. 256.
Robert M. Citino. (2004). Blitzkrieg to Desert Storm: The Evolution of Operational Warfare. USA. University Press of Kansas. P. 240.
Steven Metz. (1995). The Future of Strategy. USA. Georgetown University Press. P. 256.
Lenchenko, O. (2019). Information war: essence and forms. Ukraine. Kyiv. "Condor" publishing house. P. 120.
Semenenkо O., Moskalenko, I., Abramova, M., Koverga, V., Semenenko, L., & Tselishchev, I. (2021). On the issue of increasing the quality of economic development of the country by taking into account correlation between military expenditure and macroeconomic indicators of the country. Social Development and Security, 11(4), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2021.11.4.9
Veremiychuk O. (2018). Cyber threats to national security. Ukraine. Kyiv. "Nika-Center" publishing house. P. 192.
Mary Kaldor. (2006). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. UK. Stanford University Press. P. 256.
Zhdanov V. (2018). Theory and practice of hybrid wars: from principles to application. Ukraine. Kyiv. "Knyga" publishing house. P. 240.
David Kilcullen. (2009). The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. Australia. Oxford University Press. P. 352.
Badrak V. (2013). Information wars in the history of mankind: from antiquity to the present. Ukraine. Kyiv. Nova Zorya Publishing House. P. 344.
Lawrence Freedman. (2003). The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. USA. Palgrave Macmillan. P. 376.
Leonid Shvets. (2016). Cyber warfare: threat or opportunity? Ukraine. Kyiv. "Condor" publishing house. P. 176.
Martin van Creveld. Technology and War: From 2000 B.C. to the Present. (1991). USA. Free Press. P. 400.
Shurma R. (2017). Transformation of military art in the conditions of information troops. Ukraine. Kyiv. Kyiv University Publishing House. P. 208.
Antulio J. Echevarria II. (2014). Reconsidering the American Way of War: US Military Practice from the Revolution to Afghanistan. USA. Georgetown University Press. P. 312. In this book, Echevarria rethinks the American way of war from the Revolutionary period to the present. However, aspects of the influence of the latest technologies on US strategies and tactics may not have been sufficiently covered.
Lytvynenko O. (2017). Technologies in modern armies: from idea to implementation. Ukraine. Kyiv. "Logos" publishing house. P. 208.
Eliot A. Cohen. (2002). Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen, and Leadership in Wartime. USA. Free Press. P. 304. In this book, Cohen analyzes the interaction between military and civilian leaders during wars. However, aspects of the impact of technology on strategic decision-making may not have been sufficiently covered.
Veremiychuk O. (2014). "Army, power and national security" Ukraine. Kyiv. Aconite Publishing House. P. 176. Veremiychuk's book examines aspects of the military and national security, but may not be sufficient for a detailed examination of the impact of technology on the final outcome of military operations.
Pashkevich M. (2019). Innovative technologies in modern wars. Ukraine. Kyiv. Vsesvit Publishing House. P. 224.
Thomas X. Hammes. "The Sling and the Stone: On War in the 21st Century" (2004). USA. Zenith Press. P. 304.
Kuzmenko O. (2015). Army at the frontier of technology. Ukraine. Kyiv. Oriana-Nova Publishing House. P. 272.
Richard Overy. (1995). Why the Allies Won. UK. W. W. Norton & Company. P. 396. This book examines
Abstract views: 107 PDF Downloads: 63
Copyright (c) 2023 Volodymyr Koval, Oleh Semenenko, Serhii Baranov, Serhii Ostrovskyi, Tetiana Akinina, Yuzef Dobrovolskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
