On the issue of increasing the quality of economic development of the country by taking into account correlation between military expenditure and macroeconomic indicators of the country
Abstract
The authors' analysis of available open publications made it possible to identify one of the possible shortcomings of improving the economic development of the state, not taking into account the consequences of changes in military spending and macroeconomic indicators of the state during medium and long-term government planning.
According to the authors, taking into account foreign experience is appropriate for a comprehensive analysis of the possibilities of transformation of their own economic processes. The correlation analysis generalized the results of determining possible links / dependencies between changes in the volume of expenditures for the needs of the Ministry of Defense and the level of gross domestic expenditure, inflation, closest to Ukraine and leading countries. This made it possible to single out countries with a possible positive impact of defense spending on their economic processes. Further research in this area may identify a number of analogies that should be used to improve the policy of economic development of their own country.
Downloads
References
Chernyak O. I. Konverhentsiya vytrat na oboronnyy kompleks ta ekonomichnyy rozvytok krayiny. Visnyk KNUTSH. 2013. №. 23. P. 36–41.
Zhukov H. P. Voenno-ékonomycheskyy analyz Moscow. Voenyzdat. 2001. P. 350.
Grasse Jr. Military expansion economic decline: the impact of military spending on u.s. economic performance. New York: council on economic priorities/sharpe. 1983. p. 218.
Military and economic security perspectives. Available from: http://www.nbr.org/publications/element.aspx?id=156.
Pieroni L. Military Expenditure and Economic Growth. Italy: Department of Economics, Finance and Statistics, University of Perugia (Part II). 2007. p. 128–136.
Chapman G. Expenditures on defense affect a lot more than the deficit. Available from: http://www.context.org/iclib/ic20/chapman
Dunne J. P. Models of Military Expenditure and Growth: A critical Review. Defence and Peace Economics. 2005. P. 449–461.
Shieh J. The impact of military burden on long-run growth and welfare. Journal of Development Economics. 2002. p. 443–454.
Lomakin V. K. Vplyv viysʹkovykh vytrat na ekonomichnyy rozvytok. Available from: http://epi.cc.ua/vliyanie-voennyih-rashodov-ekonomicheskoe.html.
Vafyn S. Bernanke: ékonomyka SSHA zavysyt ot voennykh raskhodov. Available from: http://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/61326.
Lavrynov H. A. O vlyyanyy voennykh raskhodov na razvytye ékonomyky strany Voennaya myslʹ. 2007. № 12. P. 19–24.
Malkov S. Vlyyanye voennykh raskhodov na ékonomyku: skolʹko platytʹ za voennuyu bezopasnostʹ? Stsenaryy y perspektyva razvytyya Rossyy. 2011. № 1. P. 288–304.
Dann Dzh. Voprosy rehulyrovanyya voennykh raskhodov v razvyvayushchykhsya stranakh. Problemy teoryy y praktyky upravlenyya. 1999. № 3. P. 40–58.
Pozharov A. Y. Pokazately y kryteryy voenno-ékonomycheskoy bezopasnosty. Voennaya myslʹ. 2000. № 6. P. 26.
Kolinetsʹ L. B., Radynsʹkyy S. V. Vplyv zrostannya viysʹkovykh vytrat na ekonomichnyy rozvytok krayin. Efektyvna ekonomika. 2020. № 8. Available from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=8095 DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2020.8.8
Baronin A. Yak viysʹkovi konflikty vplyvayutʹ na ekonomiku. Available from: https://mind.ua/openmind/20173685-yak-vijskovi-konflikti-vplivayut-na-ekonomiku
Danek T. Analysis of Relationship between Military Expenditure and Economic Growth. The Business & Management Review. 2013. Vol. 3(3). P. 117-125.
Cheberyako O. Vplyv makroekonomichnykh pokaznykiv na finansuvannya potreb oborony derzhavy – K.: Visnyk Kyyivsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 2012. №138. P. 45-49.
Problemy ta perspektyvy zmitsnennya stiykosti finansovoyi systemy Ukrayiny. Analitychna dopovidʹ. Kyiv: NISD. 2020. P. 71.
Sokhatskyi O. Military expenditures in situations of armed conflicts and their impact on the country is Economy. European Journal of Economics and Management. 2020. Volume 6. Issue 2. P. 16-27 DOI:10.46340/eujem.2020.6.211.
Pavlikovsʹkyy A., Frolov V. Oboronna reforma: systemnyy pidkhid do oboronnoho menedzhmentu: monohrafiya yyiv: NUOU. 2020. P 274.
Chynnyky i trendy ekonomichnoho zrostannya v Ukrayini : kolektyvna monohrafiya / za red. d-ra ekon. nauk M. I. Skrypnychenko. NAN Ukrayiny. DU «In-t ekon. ta prohnozuv. NAN Ukrayiny». 2018. – P. 386. Available from: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/302.pdf.
Abstract views: 441 PDF Downloads: 223
Copyright (c) 2021 Oleh Semenenkо , Ihor Moskalenko , Maryna Abramova , Victoriia Koverga , Liliia Semenenko , Ihor Tselishchev

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).