The Effectiveness of Short-Barreled Weapons in Modern Combat Conditions

Keywords: small arms, restricted shooter movement areas, targets, short-barreled weapons, training programs, urban environments, ballistics, weapon ergonomics

Abstract

Purpose. To conduct a comprehensive technical and tactical analysis of the effectiveness of the use of short-barreled weapons in specific conditions of modern combat, considering ballistic, ergonomic and psychophysiological factors and develop scientifically based recommendations for improving tactical training programs and criteria for selecting optimal weapon models.

Method. Ballistic and technical analysis.

Findings. The study found that short-barreled weapons provide target engagement efficiency of up to 94.3% at distances of up to 15 meters with the optimal caliber of 9×19 mm Parabellum, which is due to the balance between initial velocity, energy, and trajectory stability. Significant ergonomic advantages have been established in places of limited movement: the speed of drawing the weapon is 187.5% higher, the speed of changing the position is 164.3% higher, the accuracy of shooting with one hand reaches 91.2% compared to 34.6% for long-barreled weapons. A strong correlation has been found between the ergonomic characteristics of the weapon and the speed of the shooter's reaction in a limited space. Nine tactical scenarios of use have been systematized, among which close combat in rooms, defense of trench positions and work inside armored personnel carriers dominate. Specialized training considering realistic conditions increases efficiency by 30-79% according to various criteria.

Practical implications. Development of comprehensive, scientifically grounded recommendations for the selection of optimal models of short-barreled weapons, modernization of tactical training programs with an emphasis on realistic scenarios of urban environments and confined spaces, and formulation of criteria for assessing the combat effectiveness of small arms for various tactical situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bondarovych, O. P., & Denysiuk, O. V. (2025). Methodological support of the educational and training process of cadets of the National Academy of the Security Service of Ukraine in hand-to-hand combat. Naukovyi zhurnal Natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 15. Naukovo-pedahohichni problemy fizychnoi kultury (Fizychna kultura i sport), 1(186), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.31392/udu-nc.series15.2025.01(186).05

Felde, R. M. zum. (2023). Lieutenant Colonel Amos C. Fox: Reflections on Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine – Combined Arms Warfare, the Battalion Tactical Group and Wars in a Fishbowl. SIRIUS – Zeitschrift für Strategische Analysen, 7(1), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/sirius-2023-1012

Filonenko, L. (2025). Theoretical aspects of studying the psychological foundations of readiness of the Armed Forces of Ukraine servicemen to perform combat missions. Personality and Environmental Issues, 4(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-6033-2025-4(1)-16-21

Frankova, I., Klochkov, V., Pyvovarenko, M., Hukovskyy, O., Zohar, J., & Vermetten, E. (2025). Psychological resilience in trench warfare: Leveraging mental-health frameworks for Ukrainian soldiers. Neuroscience Applied, 4, Article 105528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nsa.2025.105528

Hretskykh, O. V., & Melnyk, S. V. (2022). Law on weapons in Ukraine: Military necessity or demand of the time? Analitychna ta porivnialno-pravova iurysprudentsiia, 3, 250–253. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.03.45

Ibrahim, F., Feildboy, E., Nagy, D., Huber, Y., Hennig, J., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2024). Predicting closed-quarters-battle capability: Examining the influence of personality, attentional ability, 2D:4D ratio and mindfulness on tactical performance. Military Psychology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2024.2430578

Kaddina, I. F., Lopaieva, O. M., & Karpenko, O. M. (2025). Development of psychological resilience during firearms training under martial-law conditions. Analitychna ta porivnialno-pravova iurysprudentsiia, 3(4), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.04.3.30

Lawry, L. L., et al. (2025). Qualitative assessment of combat-related injury patterns and injury prevention in Ukraine since the Russian invasion. BMJ Military Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002863

Lopaieva, O. M., & Karpenko, O. M. (2025). Psychological preparation for shooting under combat-stress conditions. Analitychna ta porivnialno-pravova iurysprudentsiia, 3(4), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.04.3.36

Murugaiyan, S., Ruthwik, M. S., Gatta, A., & Bellam, K. (2024). An enhanced weapon-detection system using deep learning. 2nd International Conference on Networking and Communications (ICNWC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNWC60771.2024.10537568

Odierov, A., Tkachuk, O., Romaniv, I., et al. (2025). Studying the level of combat readiness of servicemen during the experiment. Naukovyi zhurnal Natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 15. Naukovo-pedahohichni problemy fizychnoi kultury (Fizychna kultura i sport), 4(190), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.31392/udu-nc.series15.2025.04(190).23

Oleksenko, O., Huk, O., Snitsarenko, V., Ikaiev, D., & Snitsarenko, O. (2025). Main features of the combat use of unmanned aerial vehicles by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation against Ukraine in 2024. Vyprobuvannia i sertyfikatsiia, 2(8), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.37701/ts.08.2025.06

Popescu, S. (2024). Infantry weapon systems used by special operations forces to carry out assigned missions. Land Forces Academy Review, 29(3), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2024-0036

Semenenko, O., Semenenko, L., Sirchenko, R., & Yarmolchuk, M. (2024). Modernization of the personnel-management system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the context of the ongoing military conflict with Russia. Systemy Logistyczne Wojsk, 60(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.37055/slw/193852

Świętochowski, N. (2023). Field artillery in the defensive war of Ukraine 2022–2023 Part I: Combat potential, tasks and tactics. Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces, 210(4), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.1631

Terzić, M. R. (2024). Effects of the use of robotized combat systems during the conflict in Ukraine from 24 February 2022. Baština, 62, 363–381. https://doi.org/10.5937/bastina34-49656

Wang, J., Yang, P., & Yan, P. (2025). Evaluation of mission effectiveness for dynamic kill network. Operational Research, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-025-00983-5

Zaluzhnyi, V. (2025). Command-and-control systems and armament: Development trends under modern armed conflicts. Elektronne Modeliuvannia, 47(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.15407/emodel.47.02.067

Zhezherun, Yu., Zaporozhets, S., Pokhodenko, A., Pinchuk, A., Mishchenko, R., & Parashchenko, T. (2023). Features of state financing of armaments and military equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine under martial law. Vyprobuvannia i sertyfikatsiia, 1(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.37701/ts.01.2023.11

Žnidaršič, V., Petrovski, A., & Radovanović, M. (2023). Characteristics of contemporary combat operations in urban areas. Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific Conference GEOBALCANICA 2023, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.18509/GBP23149zh


Abstract views: 105
PDF Downloads: 134
Published
2025-10-31
How to Cite
Open’ko, P. (2025). The Effectiveness of Short-Barreled Weapons in Modern Combat Conditions. Social Development and Security, 15(5), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.5.7
Section
Military Security