Assessment of the Relationship Between Classes of Substances of Hazard Category “Р” Using the Criterion of Heat of Combustion

Keywords: high-hazard object, object class, mass of substances, threshold mass

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the relationship between the classes of hazardous substances in category “Р” (physical hazards) and their threshold masses for high-hazard object classes 1, 2, and 3 in Ukraine, using the criterion of heat of combustion (energy potential), and to verify the presence of a systematic approach in establishing these masses.

Method. Analysis of the Ukrainian regulatory framework (CMU Resolution No. 1030) ; collection and generalization of data on the heat of combustion/decomposition for representatives of each substance class in category “Р”; calculation of the total energy potential of threshold masses of hazardous substances for high-hazard object classes 1, 2, and 3 ; statistical analysis of the obtained energy indicators (calculation of mean value, standard deviation, relative ratios) to identify correlations between hazard classes and energy potential.

Theoretical implications. The study demonstrates significant variability and a lack of direct correlation between the threshold masses established in Ukraine for substance classes in category “Р” and their heat of combustion. This questions the theoretical justification (from the perspective of a unified energy criterion) of the current high-hazard object classification system, indicating the possible influence of other, non-energetic factors.

Practical implications. The identified discrepancy between threshold masses and energy potential may indicate potential difficulties in the consistent application of a risk-oriented approach to HHO safety management in Ukraine. The results justify the need for further scientific research and potential review or clarification of criteria in the regulatory framework (Resolution No. 1030) to ensure a more consistent and scientifically based classification of high-hazard object’s, which will contribute to more adequate risk assessment and comparison.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Directorate for Civil Protection. (2018). Directive 2012/18/EU (Seveso-III-Directive) — Questions & Answers (version 2018). https://www.dsb.no/contentassets/b7f3a384ca0b4c318e6d05579d3a2952/questions--answers-seveso-iii-directive-version-2018.pdf

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2022, September 13). Resolution No. 1030 “Certain issues of identification of high-risk facilities.” Official Bulletin of Ukraine, (75), Article 4554. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/1030-2022-%D0%BF

Klyuchka, Y. (2025). Correlation Between the Class of a High-Hazard Object, the Mass of Hazardous Substances, and its Risk. Social Development and Security, 15(3), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.3.15.

Hryhorenko, O. M., Klyuchka, Y. P., & Harbuz, S. V. (2017). Classification of high-risk facilities considering the implementation of the Seveso III Directive in Ukraine. Problems of Emergency Situations, (25), 14–21. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pns_2017_25_5.

Salvi, O., Kirchsteiger, C., Delvosalle, C., Duijm, N. J., Casal, J., Goossens, L., Mazzarotta, B., Lebecki, K., Wybo, J.-L., Dusserre, G., & Londiche, H. (2002, лютий). ARAMIS: Accidental Risk Assessment Methodology for Industries in the framework of SEVESO II directive. Colloque Urbanisation et Prévention des Accidents Majeurs, Lille, France.

Christou, M. D., Struckl, M., & Biermann, T. (Ред.). (2006). Land Use Planning Guidelines in the context of Article 12 of the Seveso II Directive 96/82/EC as amended by Directive 105/2003/EC (№ EUR 22634 EN). European Commission, Joint Research Centre.

Renn, O. (1989). Risk communication at the community level: European lessons from the Seveso directive. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 39(10), 1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/08940630.1989.10466628

Chen, C., Reniers, G., & Yang, M. (2022). Safety and security of domino effects in the process industry: The state of the art. У C. Chen, G. Reniers, & M. Yang, Integrating safety and security management to protect chemical industrial areas from domino effects (с. 1–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88911-1_1

Krausmann, E. Natech risk assessment and management. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2025-07/ENG_2_Natech_risk_assessment_and_management__Ms._Elisabeth_Krausmann__TechRisk_JRC.pdf.

Grønberg, C. D. (Ред.). (2000). Land use planning and chemical sites: Summary report (№ Risø-R-1234(EN)). Risø National Laboratory.

Klyuchka Y. (2019). Analysis of consequences of terrorist attacks at hazardous industrial facilities according to directive on prevention of severe accidents. Critical infrastructure protection (NATO Science for Peace and Security Series - D: Information and Communication Security, Vol. 52, pp. 13–20). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-964-5-13


Abstract views: 116
PDF Downloads: 80
Published
2025-10-31
How to Cite
Klyuchka, Y., & Afanasenko, K. (2025). Assessment of the Relationship Between Classes of Substances of Hazard Category “Р” Using the Criterion of Heat of Combustion. Social Development and Security, 15(5), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.5.13
Section
Civil Security